Exportar Publicação
A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.
Jacinto, S. B., Lewis, C. C., Braga, J. N. & Scott, K. (2018). A conceptual model for generating and validating in-session clinical judgments. Psychotherapy Research. 28 (1), 91-105
A. S. Braga et al., "A conceptual model for generating and validating in-session clinical judgments", in Psychotherapy Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 91-105, 2018
@article{braga2018_1715039559930, author = "Jacinto, S. B. and Lewis, C. C. and Braga, J. N. and Scott, K.", title = "A conceptual model for generating and validating in-session clinical judgments", journal = "Psychotherapy Research", year = "2018", volume = "28", number = "1", doi = "10.1080/10503307.2016.1169329", pages = "91-105", url = "http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10503307.2016.1169329" }
TY - JOUR TI - A conceptual model for generating and validating in-session clinical judgments T2 - Psychotherapy Research VL - 28 IS - 1 AU - Jacinto, S. B. AU - Lewis, C. C. AU - Braga, J. N. AU - Scott, K. PY - 2018 SP - 91-105 SN - 1050-3307 DO - 10.1080/10503307.2016.1169329 UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10503307.2016.1169329 AB - Objective: Little attention has been paid to the nuanced and complex decisions made in the clinical session context and how these decisions influence therapy effectiveness. Despite decades of research on the dual-processing systems, it remains unclear when and how intuitive and analytical reasoning influence the direction of the clinical session. Method: This paper puts forth a testable conceptual model, guided by an interdisciplinary integration of the literature, that posits that the clinical session context moderates the use of intuitive versus analytical reasoning. Results: A synthesis of studies examining professional best practices in clinical decision-making, empirical evidence from clinical judgment research, and the application of decision science theories indicate that intuitive and analytical reasoning may have profoundly different impacts on clinical practice and outcomes. Conclusions: The proposed model is discussed with respect to its implications for clinical practice and future research. ER -