Export Publication

The publication can be exported in the following formats: APA (American Psychological Association) reference format, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) reference format, BibTeX and RIS.

Export Reference (APA) 
Jacinto, S. B., Lewis, C. C., Braga, J. N. & Scott, K. (2018). A conceptual model for generating and validating in-session clinical judgments. Psychotherapy Research. 28 (1), 91-105
Export Reference (IEEE) 
A. S. Braga et al.,  "A conceptual model for generating and validating in-session clinical judgments", in Psychotherapy Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 91-105, 2018
Export BibTeX 
@article{braga2018_1766443759585,
	author = "Jacinto, S. B. and Lewis, C. C. and Braga, J. N. and Scott, K.",
	title = "A conceptual model for generating and validating in-session clinical judgments",
	journal = "Psychotherapy Research",
	year = "2018",
	volume = "28",
	number = "1",
	doi = "10.1080/10503307.2016.1169329",
	pages = "91-105",
	url = "http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10503307.2016.1169329"
}
Export RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A conceptual model for generating and validating in-session clinical judgments
T2  - Psychotherapy Research
VL  - 28
IS  - 1
AU  - Jacinto, S. B.
AU  - Lewis, C. C.
AU  - Braga, J. N.
AU  - Scott, K.
PY  - 2018
SP  - 91-105
SN  - 1050-3307
DO  - 10.1080/10503307.2016.1169329
UR  - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10503307.2016.1169329
AB  - Objective: Little attention has been paid to the nuanced and complex decisions made in the clinical session context and how these decisions influence therapy effectiveness. Despite decades of research on the dual-processing systems, it remains unclear when and how intuitive and analytical reasoning influence the direction of the clinical session. Method: This paper puts forth a testable conceptual model, guided by an interdisciplinary integration of the literature, that posits that the clinical session context moderates the use of intuitive versus analytical reasoning. Results: A synthesis of studies examining professional best practices in clinical decision-making, empirical evidence from clinical judgment research, and the application of decision science theories indicate that intuitive and analytical reasoning may have profoundly different impacts on clinical practice and outcomes. Conclusions: The proposed model is discussed with respect to its implications for clinical practice and future research.
ER  -