Export Publication

The publication can be exported in the following formats: APA (American Psychological Association) reference format, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) reference format, BibTeX and RIS.

Export Reference (APA) 
Batel, S. (2018). A critical discussion of research on the social acceptance of renewable energy generation and associated infrastructures and an agenda for the future. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. 20 (3), 356-369
Export Reference (IEEE) 
S. A. Batel,  "A critical discussion of research on the social acceptance of renewable energy generation and associated infrastructures and an agenda for the future", in Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 356-369, 2018
Export BibTeX 
@article{batel2018_1766443746108,
	author = "Batel, S.",
	title = "A critical discussion of research on the social acceptance of renewable energy generation and associated infrastructures and an agenda for the future",
	journal = "Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning",
	year = "2018",
	volume = "20",
	number = "3",
	doi = "10.1080/1523908X.2017.1417120",
	pages = "356-369",
	url = "http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1523908X.2017.1417120"
}
Export RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A critical discussion of research on the social acceptance of renewable energy generation and associated infrastructures and an agenda for the future
T2  - Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning
VL  - 20
IS  - 3
AU  - Batel, S.
PY  - 2018
SP  - 356-369
SN  - 1523-908X
DO  - 10.1080/1523908X.2017.1417120
UR  - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1523908X.2017.1417120
AB  - Social sciences’ research on the social acceptance of renewable energy generation and associated technologies (RET), such as high voltage power lines, has been growing in the last decades. In fact, while RET are considered one of the main mitigation measures of climate change, opposition to their construction, and namely from the local communities living nearby, is often found. Important conceptual proposals have been made for a better understanding of opposition, however, this literature still presents some limitations. Here, I will discuss two of them: first, the main focus on the local and, with it, the lack of a relational and critical approach, which recognizes opposition and other types of responses to RET as public participation in RET-related issues; second, the focus on the individual and the consequent lack of examining people’s material practices and engagements.
ER  -