Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Fernandez, B., Vigário, M., Jerónimo, R., Kai Alter & Frota, S. (2017). Processing words and non-words: An ERP study on the impact of phonotatic frequency and phonological grammar. XIII International Symposium of Psycholinguistics.
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
B. L. Fernandez et al.,  "Processing words and non-words: An ERP study on the impact of phonotatic frequency and phonological grammar", in XIII Int. Symp. of Psycholinguistics, 2017
Exportar BibTeX 
@misc{fernandez2017_1766250016088,
	author = "Fernandez, B. and Vigário, M. and Jerónimo, R. and Kai Alter and Frota, S.",
	title = "Processing words and non-words: An ERP study on the impact of phonotatic frequency and phonological grammar",
	year = "2017"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - CPAPER
TI  - Processing words and non-words: An ERP study on the impact of phonotatic frequency and phonological grammar
T2  - XIII International Symposium of Psycholinguistics
AU  - Fernandez, B.
AU  - Vigário, M.
AU  - Jerónimo, R.
AU  - Kai Alter
AU  - Frota, S.
PY  - 2017
AB  - Phonological   representations   are   mapped   onto   semantic   representations   in   word processing. This mapping is influenced by phonotactic knowledge, with high-and low-probability  words,  and  pseudowords  and  phonotactically  illegal  sequences  showing processing  differences.  However,  the  fine  details  of  this  processing  are  not  yet  fully understood. In an event-related potentials (ERPs) study, using a picture-word paradigm, we  investigated  the  role  of  phonological  grammar  (word-like  status/illegal  sequences) and  frequency  (high/low  probability  pseudowords)  in  word  processing,  as  indexed  by the N400, to find whether/how phonotactic probability interacts with word(-like) status. An N400 was identified for incongruous words, asexpected. The effect was modulated by word-like status, showing a later latency for pseudowords. Illegal sequences did not show an N400, but instead an early effect within the N1-P2 time range. These findings suggest that  grammatical illegal sequences  areearly detected and processed differently from words and pseudowords, and pseudowords are also differentiated from words. No crucial  differences  were  found  due  to  relative  phonotactic  frequency.  In  short,  word processing  is  rather  driven  by  phonological  grammar  and  not  by  language  use,  with implications for usage-based and grammatical models of language.
ER  -