Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Castro, P. (2017). Persuading by legal means? Re-opening Antigone for revisiting the tensions between the legal and the legitimate in the biodiversity debate. Social representations and social influence:  beyond Moscovici.
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
F. P. Castro,  "Persuading by legal means? Re-opening Antigone for revisiting the tensions between the legal and the legitimate in the biodiversity debate", in Social representations and social influence:  beyond Moscovici, London, 2017
Exportar BibTeX 
@misc{castro2017_1766870470489,
	author = "Castro, P.",
	title = "Persuading by legal means? Re-opening Antigone for revisiting the tensions between the legal and the legitimate in the biodiversity debate",
	year = "2017",
	howpublished = "Digital"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - CPAPER
TI  - Persuading by legal means? Re-opening Antigone for revisiting the tensions between the legal and the legitimate in the biodiversity debate
T2  - Social representations and social influence:  beyond Moscovici
AU  - Castro, P.
PY  - 2017
CY  - London
AB  - Abstract
I will re-open Sophocles’ Antigone for: (1) offering a psycho-social reading of the play’s tensions between the legal and the legitimate, showing how Antigone and Creon attempt to, respectively, legitimize an (illegal) action and a new law; (2) Discussing how these tensions can help understand today’s conflicts around new EU biodiversity laws. Regarding the first goal, I will explore how the play’s tensions demonstrate how the legitimate and the legal are constructed in different universes: the consensual universe of shared, but also heterogeneous and dilemmatic values; and the reified universe of state institutions, which reify only some of the values of the former. Second, I will show how the play, as Moscovici has noted, also illustrates two different political options: “politics as necessity”, appealing to the reified for legitimacy, and “politics as contingency”, appealing to the consensual. As a second goal, I will explore how both tensions and options help understand public contestation of the legitimacy of the new EU biodiversity laws, and how the play stimulates re-imagining an ecological governance more capable of integrating both universes.

ER  -