Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA)
Stellacci, S., Rato, V., Poletti, E., Vasconcelos, G. & Borsoi, G. (2018). Multi-criteria analysis of rehabilitation techniques for traditional timber frame walls in Pombalino buildings (Lisbon). Journal of Building Engineering. 16, 184-198
Exportar Referência (IEEE)
S. Stellacci et al.,  "Multi-criteria analysis of rehabilitation techniques for traditional timber frame walls in Pombalino buildings (Lisbon)", in Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 16, pp. 184-198, 2018
Exportar BibTeX
@article{stellacci2018_1714263232732,
	author = "Stellacci, S. and Rato, V. and Poletti, E. and Vasconcelos, G. and Borsoi, G.",
	title = "Multi-criteria analysis of rehabilitation techniques for traditional timber frame walls in Pombalino buildings (Lisbon)",
	journal = "Journal of Building Engineering",
	year = "2018",
	volume = "16",
	number = "",
	doi = "10.1016/j.jobe.2018.01.001",
	pages = "184-198",
	url = "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710217304229"
}
Exportar RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Multi-criteria analysis of rehabilitation techniques for traditional timber frame walls in Pombalino buildings (Lisbon)
T2  - Journal of Building Engineering
VL  - 16
AU  - Stellacci, S.
AU  - Rato, V.
AU  - Poletti, E.
AU  - Vasconcelos, G.
AU  - Borsoi, G.
PY  - 2018
SP  - 184-198
SN  - 2352-7102
DO  - 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.01.001
UR  - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710217304229
AB  - This research aims to evaluate the intervention techniques currently adopted for the traditional timber frame wall, using a case study in downtown Lisbon. Different rehabilitation solutions were identified and assessed through a multi-criteria decision analysis using dedicated software (M-Macbeth, Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical-Based Evaluation technique). Five evaluation criteria, i.e. material compatibility and permanence, structural reliability and authenticity, and visual-tactile appearance, were selected for this specific context. A multidisciplinary panel of experts in conservation science were consulted for defining the performance descriptors, evaluation levels, and weightings of these criteria. Results show that Macbeth is a useful decision-aid capable of handling multiple outputs generated from qualitative expert judgments. Lastly, the predominance of five best-scoring interventions within three design-related scenarios is discussed.
ER  -