Export Publication

The publication can be exported in the following formats: APA (American Psychological Association) reference format, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) reference format, BibTeX and RIS.

Export Reference (APA) 
Padilla, B. & Rodrigues, V. (2017). Doing community research with the community? Reflecting on practical issues. La Critica Sociologica. 203 (3), 59-74
Export Reference (IEEE) 
E. B. Padilla and V. L. Rodrigues,  "Doing community research with the community? Reflecting on practical issues", in La Critica Sociologica, vol. 203, no. 3, pp. 59-74, 2017
Export BibTeX 
@article{padilla2017_1766261335180,
	author = "Padilla, B. and Rodrigues, V.",
	title = "Doing community research with the community? Reflecting on practical issues",
	journal = "La Critica Sociologica",
	year = "2017",
	volume = "203",
	number = "3",
	doi = "10.19272/201701203005",
	pages = "59-74",
	url = "http://www.lacriticasociologica.it/"
}
Export RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Doing community research with the community? Reflecting on practical issues
T2  - La Critica Sociologica
VL  - 203
IS  - 3
AU  - Padilla, B.
AU  - Rodrigues, V.
PY  - 2017
SP  - 59-74
SN  - 0011-1546
DO  - 10.19272/201701203005
UR  - http://www.lacriticasociologica.it/
AB  - This article reflects critically on the application of a participatory/collaborative methodology through the incorporation of community researchers (Crs), in a project entitled ‘Under- standing the practice and developing the concept of welfare bricolage’ (upweb), aiming to understand how residents of superdiverse neighbourhoods deal with their health concerns, searching for solutions and designing viable practices to solve them. We engage in a critical understanding of this method, reflecting on its methodological challenges (i.e. recruitment of Crs, providing & developing skills through training, the quality of the data collected, inter- pretation of findings and co-production of knowledge) hoping to contribute to the debate and to improve the applicability of specific forms of participatory/collaborative approaches in future research. In spite of challenges, the benefits of including Crs exceed its limitations as a paradigm and as a practice, enhancing its validity (in terms of community knowledge), its accountability (in terms of potential for intervention and social change), in strengthening superdiversity in terms of maximum diversity sampling.
ER  -