Exportar Publicação

Kalantaridis, C., Küttim, M., Govind, M. & Sousa, C. (2017). How to commercialise university-generated knowledge internationally? A comparative analysis of contingent institutional conditions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 123, 35-44

C. Kalantaridis et al.,  "How to commercialise university-generated knowledge internationally? A comparative analysis of contingent institutional conditions", in Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 123, pp. 35-44, 2017

@article{kalantaridis2017_1715075973889,
	author = "Kalantaridis, C. and Küttim, M. and Govind, M. and Sousa, C.",
	title = "How to commercialise university-generated knowledge internationally? A comparative analysis of contingent institutional conditions",
	journal = "Technological Forecasting and Social Change",
	year = "2017",
	volume = "123",
	number = "",
	doi = "10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.013",
	pages = "35-44",
	url = "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162516303080?via%3Dihub"
}

TY  - JOUR
TI  - How to commercialise university-generated knowledge internationally? A comparative analysis of contingent institutional conditions
T2  - Technological Forecasting and Social Change
VL  - 123
AU  - Kalantaridis, C.
AU  - Küttim, M.
AU  - Govind, M.
AU  - Sousa, C.
PY  - 2017
SP  - 35-44
SN  - 0040-1625
DO  - 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.013
UR  - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162516303080?via%3Dihub
AB  - Our paper sets out to explore the contingent institutional conditions that underpin knowledge transfer, and particularly commercialisation, from universities to enterprises across national borders. We explore the phenomenon in four technology-focused and research leading (in the national context) universities in Estonia, India, Portugal and the UK. We argue that participants in interactions (despite the fact that they maintain their core operations in different institutional fields) possess common knowledge bases, and shared norms and cognitive frameworks. In many cases however, the emergence of organisational rules to facilitate interactions do not lead to the institutionalisation of the processes at work: restricting the scope of both existing interactions and their advancement and offering a central role to nonpracticing entities. The paper advances university-led pooling of intellectual property (geographically or sectorally) as an alternative for institutionalisation.
ER  -