Exportar Publicação
A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.
Faria, P., Ferreira, F., Jalali, M., Bento, P. & António, N. (2018). Combining cognitive mapping and MCDA for improving quality of life in urban areas. Cities. 78, 116-127
P. A. Faria et al., "Combining cognitive mapping and MCDA for improving quality of life in urban areas", in Cities, vol. 78, pp. 116-127, 2018
@article{faria2018_1731980169102, author = "Faria, P. and Ferreira, F. and Jalali, M. and Bento, P. and António, N.", title = "Combining cognitive mapping and MCDA for improving quality of life in urban areas", journal = "Cities", year = "2018", volume = "78", number = "", doi = "10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.006", pages = "116-127", url = "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275117312234?via%3Dihub" }
TY - JOUR TI - Combining cognitive mapping and MCDA for improving quality of life in urban areas T2 - Cities VL - 78 AU - Faria, P. AU - Ferreira, F. AU - Jalali, M. AU - Bento, P. AU - António, N. PY - 2018 SP - 116-127 SN - 0264-2751 DO - 10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.006 UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275117312234?via%3Dihub AB - Assessing quality of life (QoL) in urban areas is considered a difficult endeavor. Some of the main reasons for this difficulty are directly related to the complexity inherent in the multiplicity of criteria that must be considered in such an evaluation, as well as the subjectivity intrinsic to the issue under study. This complexity hinders the development of models capable of reflecting the performance of different urban environments in terms of their QoL. This study sought to overcome some of the more common limitations of current evaluation methods, by combining cognitive mapping and the measuring attractiveness by a categorical based evaluation technique (MACBETH), to develop a more informed, coherent and transparent evaluation system. The resulting framework and its application were validated both by the participating panel of experts and a representative of the parliamentary group of the Portuguese ecologist party “The Greens”. The advantages and limitations of our framework are also subject of analysis and discussion. It is worth noting that the whole process assumes a constructivist stance, allowing both objective and subjective elements to be combined in the decision-making framework. ER -