Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Junça Silva, A., Caetano, António & Lopes, M. (2012). Development and validation of taxonomy of affective events at work. IX ISQOLS Conference: Discovering new frontiers in Quality-of-life Research.
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
A. L. Silva et al.,  "Development and validation of taxonomy of affective events at work", in IX ISQOLS Conf.: Discovering new frontiers in Quality-of-life Research, Veneza, 2012
Exportar BibTeX 
@misc{silva2012_1732206593755,
	author = "Junça Silva, A. and Caetano, António and Lopes, M.",
	title = "Development and validation of taxonomy of affective events at work",
	year = "2012",
	howpublished = "Ambos (impresso e digital)"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - CPAPER
TI  - Development and validation of taxonomy of affective events at work
T2  - IX ISQOLS Conference: Discovering new frontiers in Quality-of-life Research
AU  - Junça Silva, A.
AU  - Caetano, António
AU  - Lopes, M.
PY  - 2012
CY  - Veneza
AB  - Affective events theory (Weiss, & Cropanzano, 1996) highlights the importance of affective events at work as antecedents of several emotional experiences, employees´ work related behaviours and attitudes. 
However, a comprehensive picture on the kind of events that occur frequently in the workplace and a universally valid approach regarding the assessment of work events is lacking. 
The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive taxonomy of affective events. As such, we conducted semi-structured interviews with design and format based on previous research (Basch, & Fisher, 1998; Fitness, 2000). Participants described events at work that had caused them to experience specific emotions. 
All responses were transcribed, analyzed and then sorted into general categories according to their thematic similarity. We identified 7 categories of negative job-related events and 6 categories of positive job-related events.
Overall, were reported 229 daily events, (133 positive and 96 negative events). The largest overall positive event category was “interpersonal interaction”. Within this category, the most frequent event was “having a good time and laughing”. The most frequent overall negative category was “operational hassles”. The most frequent event was “having a poor performance on a task”.
This study adds to previous research by providing a comprehensive yet parsimonious classification of both positive and negative affective events. 

ER  -