Exportar Publicação
A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.
Santos, S., Ferreiro, Maria de Fátima, Ramos, Isabel & Gonçalves, Alexandre (2018). Hidden and injust geographies. Finding Places of Marginalization and Vulnerability in Lisbon Metropolitan Area. 5th Global Conference on Economic Geography 2018.
S. F. Santos et al., "Hidden and injust geographies. Finding Places of Marginalization and Vulnerability in Lisbon Metropolitan Area", in 5th Global Conf. on Economic Geography 2018, Colónia, 2018
@misc{santos2018_1768970105057,
author = "Santos, S. and Ferreiro, Maria de Fátima and Ramos, Isabel and Gonçalves, Alexandre",
title = "Hidden and injust geographies. Finding Places of Marginalization and Vulnerability in Lisbon Metropolitan Area",
year = "2018",
url = "https://www.arl-net.de/en/events/5th-global-conference-economic-geography-2018"
}
TY - CPAPER TI - Hidden and injust geographies. Finding Places of Marginalization and Vulnerability in Lisbon Metropolitan Area T2 - 5th Global Conference on Economic Geography 2018 AU - Santos, S. AU - Ferreiro, Maria de Fátima AU - Ramos, Isabel AU - Gonçalves, Alexandre PY - 2018 CY - Colónia UR - https://www.arl-net.de/en/events/5th-global-conference-economic-geography-2018 AB - Lisbon Metropolitan Area (LMA) may be considered a blend of ‘leading’ territories co-existing with ‘lagging territories’ where problems such as lack of land use planning, landscape disqualification, economic disadvantages, or social-spatial expulsion persist and remain partially unsolved (Need to disrupt the Resilience of an Uneven Geography) The Asynchrony between Planning Instruments / Public Policies and Urban Transformations across time may lead to the Loss of Relevance of Territorial Planning System as a strategic resource in the establishment of more sustainable territories (New Instruments for Old/New Challenges) The methodology of ranking indicators edge-values at different scales demonstrated to be useful allowing to map places where extreme territorial processes occur (systemic edges) questioning the role of general strategies in solving site-specific problems/aspirations (Public Polices vs. Space Policies) Overall statistical information is reliable but unadjusted to contemporary change, speed and degree of place particularities-There is a lack of information at Subsection Levels (namely in what concerns economic data and the secrecy to which it is subjected) undermining a complete high definition study- The period of time in witch census are made (10 years) are incompatible with the fast social-economic transformations (New ways of Producing and Democratizing Information) If planning/police action is exclusively driven by indicators average-values and administrative borders, it may be persistently pushing off-the-map, pockets of disadvantaged geographies, weighing statistical relevance against social urgency and hindering the path towards a more inclusive and hopeful city. ER -
English