Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Silva, J., Esperança, J. P. & Almeida, I. D. (2018). Quo vadis microcredit in Portugal? A case study of the day-to-day of an entrepreneur. In António Oliveira,  Brizeida Hernández,   Carolina Rodrigues, José Carlos Sánchez García, Mário Carrilho Negas,  M. Fátima Lobão, Orlando Rua  (Ed.), Ciem2018 – 8ª Conferencia Ibérica de Emprendimiento. Salamanca: CIEM.
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
J. M. Silva et al.,  "Quo vadis microcredit in Portugal? A case study of the day-to-day of an entrepreneur", in Ciem2018 – 8ª Conferencia Ibérica de Emprendimiento, António Oliveira,  Brizeida Hernández,   Carolina Rodrigues, José Carlos Sánchez García, Mário Carrilho Negas,  M. Fátima Lobão, Orlando Rua , Ed., Salamanca, CIEM, 2018
Exportar BibTeX 
@inproceedings{silva2018_1732203585240,
	author = "Silva, J. and Esperança, J. P. and Almeida, I. D.",
	title = "Quo vadis microcredit in Portugal? A case study of the day-to-day of an entrepreneur",
	booktitle = "Ciem2018 – 8ª Conferencia Ibérica de Emprendimiento",
	year = "2018",
	editor = "António Oliveira,  Brizeida Hernández,   Carolina Rodrigues, José Carlos Sánchez García, Mário Carrilho Negas,  M. Fátima Lobão, Orlando Rua ",
	volume = "",
	number = "",
	series = "",
	publisher = "CIEM",
	address = "Salamanca",
	organization = "CIEM",
	url = "http://ciem.pt/cf2018/"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - CPAPER
TI  - Quo vadis microcredit in Portugal? A case study of the day-to-day of an entrepreneur
T2  - Ciem2018 – 8ª Conferencia Ibérica de Emprendimiento
AU  - Silva, J.
AU  - Esperança, J. P.
AU  - Almeida, I. D.
PY  - 2018
CY  - Salamanca
UR  - http://ciem.pt/cf2018/
AB  - A literature survey shows conflicts among the expected advantages of microcredit public-policies that might lead to discomfort on decision-making, and self-protection reactions due to increasing social demand for accountability. So, decisionmakers lacking skills and sensitiveness to the entrepreneurial phenomenon, set assessment criteria, based on banking practice, inadequate to unemployed, young, low income entrepreneurs. Together with unorganized processes, this situation produces disrespectful loan proposals ignoring experts’ opinions and business plans/contexts. The exploratory case of a Mutual Guarantee Society guaranteed by public funding: exemplifies ridiculous loan proposals for microcredit funding, conflicting with social grounds; shows entrepreneurs difficulties in accessing microcredit public-policies.  
ER  -