Export Publication

The publication can be exported in the following formats: APA (American Psychological Association) reference format, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) reference format, BibTeX and RIS.

Export Reference (APA) 
Entradas, M. (2015). Science and the public: public participation and the new politics of PUS (II). Portuguese Journal of Social Science. 14 (2), 193-206
Export Reference (IEEE) 
M. C. Entradas,  "Science and the public: public participation and the new politics of PUS (II)", in Portuguese Journal of Social Science, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 193-206, 2015
Export BibTeX 
@article{entradas2015_1716030863713,
	author = "Entradas, M.",
	title = "Science and the public: public participation and the new politics of PUS (II)",
	journal = "Portuguese Journal of Social Science",
	year = "2015",
	volume = "14",
	number = "2",
	doi = "10.1386/pjss.14.2.193_1",
	pages = "193-206",
	url = "https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/intellect/pjss/2015/00000014/00000002/art00006"
}
Export RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Science and the public: public participation and the new politics of PUS (II)
T2  - Portuguese Journal of Social Science
VL  - 14
IS  - 2
AU  - Entradas, M.
PY  - 2015
SP  - 193-206
SN  - 1476-413X
DO  - 10.1386/pjss.14.2.193_1
UR  - https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/intellect/pjss/2015/00000014/00000002/art00006
AB  - This article is the second of a two-part literature review on the evolution of the relationship between science and the public after the second half of the twentieth century. The first part presented a general review on public understanding of science (PUS), PUS measurements and what has motivated a shift from a deficit model to a contextual one. In this second part, we look more closely at the discussion around the role of the public in science and the transformation from the idea that lay people are isolated from science to the idea that the public should participate in policy-making on science and technology issues. In particular, we focus on the debate around who should and should not contribute to decision-making by presenting both the arguments in favour of and against public participation in science policy.
ER  -