Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Daniel, F., Monteiro, R., Ferreira, J. & Ana Galhardo (2019). The Portuguese version of the Hartford Geriatric Social Work Competency Scale II – assessment subscale: factor structure and psychometric properties. Journal of Gerontological Social Work. 62 (3), 349-362
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
F. Daniel et al.,  "The Portuguese version of the Hartford Geriatric Social Work Competency Scale II – assessment subscale: factor structure and psychometric properties", in Journal of Gerontological Social Work, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 349-362, 2019
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{daniel2019_1714183496946,
	author = "Daniel, F. and Monteiro, R. and Ferreira, J. and Ana Galhardo",
	title = "The Portuguese version of the Hartford Geriatric Social Work Competency Scale II – assessment subscale: factor structure and psychometric properties",
	journal = "Journal of Gerontological Social Work",
	year = "2019",
	volume = "62",
	number = "3",
	doi = "10.1080/01634372.2019.1575132",
	pages = "349-362",
	url = "https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01634372.2019.1575132"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The Portuguese version of the Hartford Geriatric Social Work Competency Scale II – assessment subscale: factor structure and psychometric properties
T2  - Journal of Gerontological Social Work
VL  - 62
IS  - 3
AU  - Daniel, F.
AU  - Monteiro, R.
AU  - Ferreira, J.
AU  - Ana Galhardo
PY  - 2019
SP  - 349-362
SN  - 0163-4372
DO  - 10.1080/01634372.2019.1575132
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01634372.2019.1575132
AB  - The current study aimed to test the fit of the Portuguese version of the Hartford Geriatric Social Work Competency Scale II – Assessment subscale (GSWCS-A) and explore its factor structure and psychometric properties in a sample of 534 social workers working in the gerontology field. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all items presented good factor loadings and that the single-component model fit the data well. The GSWCS-A showed very good internal consistency. Despite the existence of different theoretical perspectives on Social Work, which frame the required competencies for professional practice, the GSWCS-A Portuguese version revealed similitudes with studies conducted in other countries. Nevertheless, the different factor structures (single-component vs. bi-factorial) may indicate that different competencies are being emphasised in terms of professional training. To sum, the GSWCS-A may be a short and useful self-report instrument for addressing social workers’ assessment competencies in the gerontology setting.
ER  -