Exportar Publicação

Carmona, M., Guerra, R., Sindic, D. & Hofhuis, J.  (2019). The complexities of large "We's": different meanings of extremely inclusive identities. IX Simpósio Nacional de Investigação em Psicologia.

M. G. Lima et al.,  "The complexities of large "We's": different meanings of extremely inclusive identities", in IX Simpósio Nacional de Investigação em Psicologia, Funchal, 2019

@misc{lima2019_1776365836458,
	author = "Carmona, M. and Guerra, R. and Sindic, D. and Hofhuis, J. ",
	title = "The complexities of large "We's": different meanings of extremely inclusive identities",
	year = "2019",
	howpublished = "Digital",
	url = "http://appsicologia.org/Files_xSnip/Livro_de_resumos_-25-06_FINAL.pdf"
}

TY  - CPAPER
TI  - The complexities of large "We's": different meanings of extremely inclusive identities
T2  - IX Simpósio Nacional de Investigação em Psicologia
AU  - Carmona, M.
AU  - Guerra, R.
AU  - Sindic, D.
AU  - Hofhuis, J. 
PY  - 2019
CY  - Funchal
UR  - http://appsicologia.org/Files_xSnip/Livro_de_resumos_-25-06_FINAL.pdf
AB  - The impact of new forms of highly inclusive superordinate identities (i.e., categories that any person may consider oneself  a  member)  is  complex,  as  illustrated  by  its  positive  (e.g.  intergroup  help)  and  negative  (e.g.  ingroup  projection)  effects  on  intergroup  relations.  Most  of  these  studies,  however,  relied  on  a  variety  of  labels  (e.g.,  humans;  global  citizens)  and  their  content  remains  unclear.  We  propose  that  different  labels  activate  different  contents and conducted 7 studies, using a prototype approach, to examine lay perceptions of highly inclusive social categories. In Study 1 (n = 240), an inductive content analysis of attributes generated by participants revealed that labels activate significantly different sets of constructs. Specifically, we proposed a distinction between all-inclusive and  globally-oriented  labels.  Studies  2-7  focused  on  “Citizens  of  the  World”,  as  a  globally-oriented  label,  and  preliminary results suggest its prototypical structure. Participants (Study 2, n = 127) rated the centrality of attributes generated  in  Study  1,  allowing  the  identification  of  central  (e.g.,  multiculturalism)  and  peripheral  (e.g.,  affection)  attributes.  As  predicted,  central  attributes  (vs.  peripheral)  were  more  accurately  and  quickly  associated  with  the  label (Study 3; n = 53); more often remembered and falsely recognized (Study 4; n = 64); more effective to identify the label (Study 5; n = 97); and prompted higher levels of identification with the label (Studies 6, n = 62, and 7, n = 203). These findings provide useful insights to a better understanding the meaning and the ambiguous effects of highly inclusive identities
ER  -