Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Esteves, A. (2021). Solidarity economy markets as “mobilizational commons”:  re-signifying the market through the lens of cooperation. Community Development Journal. 56 (3), 470-483
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
A. M. Esteves,  "Solidarity economy markets as “mobilizational commons”:  re-signifying the market through the lens of cooperation", in Community Development Journal, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 470-483, 2021
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{esteves2021_1731979956634,
	author = "Esteves, A.",
	title = "Solidarity economy markets as “mobilizational commons”:  re-signifying the market through the lens of cooperation",
	journal = "Community Development Journal",
	year = "2021",
	volume = "56",
	number = "3",
	doi = "10.1093/cdj/bsaa008",
	pages = "470-483",
	url = "https://academic.oup.com/cdj/pages/About"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Solidarity economy markets as “mobilizational commons”:  re-signifying the market through the lens of cooperation
T2  - Community Development Journal
VL  - 56
IS  - 3
AU  - Esteves, A.
PY  - 2021
SP  - 470-483
SN  - 0010-3802
DO  - 10.1093/cdj/bsaa008
UR  - https://academic.oup.com/cdj/pages/About
AB  - This article explores an understudied dimension of Solidarity Economy, which is how spaces of community development-oriented commercialization balance the embedment of their activities in cooperative norms and practices, while at the same time mobilizing support from pre-existing social structures and their institutions. The analysis is based on the case study of the Solidarity Economy markets organized by Esperança/Cooesperança, a community development project based in the town of Santa Maria, in the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul. It engages the concept of “edge work”, from Social Permaculture Design, in framing Solidarity Economy markets as spaces that manifest Karl Polanyi’s vision of an “active society” in counter-movement to market commodification. This materializes as a reconciliation of cooperative practices with market mechanisms, based on trust-building and political mobilization, among different social sectors and agents, around direct producer-to-consumer exchanges. The analysis frames these markets as “mobilizational commons”: Sites of re-signification of market activity through the engagement of otherwise competing producers in experimenting, enacting and coordinating cooperative practices, as well as of consumers, social movements and the state in the re-framing economic activity over time. It concludes with an analysis of the political limitations to the “edge work” promoted by Esperança/Cooesperança, posed by electoral rotation and political socialization. The conclusions include suggestions for a research agenda on the impact of the “edge work” carried out by professionalized project managers of Solidarity Economy markets on different dimensions of community development.  

ER  -