Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Da Veiga, M. R. & Major, M. (2019). Ethics in TCE: An Application of TCE to the Case of the Internal Oversight at the United Nations. 18th International Conference on Social Sciences.
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
M. D. Veiga and M. J. Major,  "Ethics in TCE: An Application of TCE to the Case of the Internal Oversight at the United Nations", in 18th Int. Conf. on Social Sciences, 2019
Exportar BibTeX 
@misc{veiga2019_1732197951034,
	author = "Da Veiga, M. R. and Major, M.",
	title = "Ethics in TCE: An Application of TCE to the Case of the Internal Oversight at the United Nations",
	year = "2019",
	url = "http://sites.euser.org/icss18"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - CPAPER
TI  - Ethics in TCE: An Application of TCE to the Case of the Internal Oversight at the United Nations
T2  - 18th International Conference on Social Sciences
AU  - Da Veiga, M. R.
AU  - Major, M.
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://sites.euser.org/icss18
AB  - This paper provides Aristotelian virtue ethics analysis of decisions regarding the UN internal oversight governance structures focused on Transaction Cost Economics (TCE) theory. We explore “probity” and “independence” transactions’ attributes through historical narrative case based research to answer to the question – Why consecutive decisions to strengthen internal oversight structures did not relieve “probity” hazards? Our analysis shows that, at the UN, increased oversight governance structures, i.e. incentives, did not relieve probity/ethics hazards as predicted in TCE (Williamson, 1999). It follows that executive powers’ as well as overseers’ systematically trumpeted the UN “rules of the game”, breaching probity/ethics, disregarding the oversight independence prerogative as well as the UN Charter failing to contribute to the “common good” and to protect the UN mission. It also follows that, as it stands by now, the internal oversight mechanism design is deffective insofar as the UN Charter, positions the Secretary-General in constant conflict of interest empowering he/she with both executive and judiciary powers. We apply Williamson’s Public and Private Bureaucracies TCE for the first time. It results that it should be modified to include “virtue ethics” behavioral assumption as a transaction costs’ reduction device and explanatory framework for ethical failures abandoning the opportunism behavioral assumption.
ER  -