Export Publication

The publication can be exported in the following formats: APA (American Psychological Association) reference format, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) reference format, BibTeX and RIS.

Export Reference (APA) 
Santos, J. M., Horta, H. & Amâncio, L. (2021). Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia. Gender and Education. 33 (5), 625-643
Export Reference (IEEE) 
J. M. Santos et al.,  "Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia", in Gender and Education, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 625-643, 2021
Export BibTeX 
@article{santos2021_1764994720921,
	author = "Santos, J. M. and Horta, H. and Amâncio, L.",
	title = "Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia",
	journal = "Gender and Education",
	year = "2021",
	volume = "33",
	number = "5",
	doi = "10.1080/09540253.2020.1792844",
	pages = "625-643",
	url = "https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09540253.2020.1792844"
}
Export RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia
T2  - Gender and Education
VL  - 33
IS  - 5
AU  - Santos, J. M.
AU  - Horta, H.
AU  - Amâncio, L.
PY  - 2021
SP  - 625-643
SN  - 0954-0253
DO  - 10.1080/09540253.2020.1792844
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09540253.2020.1792844
AB  - The presence of gender disparities in academia was assessed by analysing the characteristics of the research agendas of academics. Multivariate analysis of variance and structural equation modelling coupled with multi-group analysis were used to identify different gender trajectories. The research agenda preferences of women were less risky and less focused on fields likely to lead to scientific discovery, but were organised in a more collaborative way than those of men. In addition, institutional characteristics were found to influence the research agenda preferences of both women and men. However, the perceived autonomy allowed by a university was more important for female than for male academics to develop more ambitious, collaborative, risky and multidisciplinary efforts. Female academics also needed more time after completing their PhD to develop a preference for riskier research agendas, but past research outputs, the number of co-authors and mobility did not change their agendas.
ER  -