Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA)
Entradas, M., Bauer, M. W., O'Muircheartaigh, C., Marcinkowski, F., Okamura, A., Pellegrini, G....Li, Y.-Y. (2020). Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility?. PLoS One. 15 (7)
Exportar Referência (IEEE)
M. C. Entradas et al.,  "Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility?", in PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 7, 2020
Exportar BibTeX
@article{entradas2020_1711702812626,
	author = "Entradas, M. and Bauer, M. W. and O'Muircheartaigh, C. and Marcinkowski, F. and Okamura, A. and Pellegrini, G. and Besley, J. and Massarani, L. and Russo, P. and Anthony Dudo and Saracino, B. and Silva, C. and Kano, K. and Amorim, L. and Bucchi, M. and Suerdem, A. and Oyama, T. and Li, Y.-Y.",
	title = "Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility?",
	journal = "PLoS One",
	year = "2020",
	volume = "15",
	number = "7",
	doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0235191",
	url = "https://journals.plos.org/plosone/"
}
Exportar RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility?
T2  - PLoS One
VL  - 15
IS  - 7
AU  - Entradas, M.
AU  - Bauer, M. W.
AU  - O'Muircheartaigh, C.
AU  - Marcinkowski, F.
AU  - Okamura, A.
AU  - Pellegrini, G.
AU  - Besley, J.
AU  - Massarani, L.
AU  - Russo, P.
AU  - Anthony Dudo
AU  - Saracino, B.
AU  - Silva, C.
AU  - Kano, K.
AU  - Amorim, L.
AU  - Bucchi, M.
AU  - Suerdem, A.
AU  - Oyama, T.
AU  - Li, Y.-Y.
PY  - 2020
SN  - 1932-6203
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0235191
UR  - https://journals.plos.org/plosone/
AB  - Leading academic institutions, governments, and funders of research across the world have spent the last few decades fretting publicly about the need for scientists and research organisations to engage more widely with the public and be open about their research. While a global literature asserts that public communication has changed from a virtue to a duty for scientists in many countries and disciplines, our knowledge about what research institutions are doing and what factors drive their 'going public' is very limited. Here we present the first cross-national study of N = 2,030 research institutes within universities and large scientific organisations in Brazil, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. We find that institutes embrace communication with non-peers and do so through a variety of public events and traditional news media-less so through new media channels-and we find variation across countries and sciences, yet these are less evident than we expected. Country and disciplinary cultures contribute to the level of this communication, as do the resources that institutes make available for the effort; institutes with professionalised staff show higher activity online. Future research should examine whether a real change in the organisational culture is happening or whether this activity and resource allocation is merely a means to increase institutional visibility.
ER  -