Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA)
Laurenti, R., Singh, J., Cotrim, J. M., Toni, M. & Sinha, R. (2019). Characterizing the sharing economy state of the research: a systematic map. Sustainability. 11 (20)
Exportar Referência (IEEE)
R. Laurenti et al.,  "Characterizing the sharing economy state of the research: a systematic map", in Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 20, 2019
Exportar BibTeX
@article{laurenti2019_1730765938222,
	author = "Laurenti, R. and Singh, J. and Cotrim, J. M. and Toni, M. and Sinha, R.",
	title = "Characterizing the sharing economy state of the research: a systematic map",
	journal = "Sustainability",
	year = "2019",
	volume = "11",
	number = "20",
	doi = "10.3390/su11205729",
	url = "https://www.mdpi.com"
}
Exportar RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Characterizing the sharing economy state of the research: a systematic map
T2  - Sustainability
VL  - 11
IS  - 20
AU  - Laurenti, R.
AU  - Singh, J.
AU  - Cotrim, J. M.
AU  - Toni, M.
AU  - Sinha, R.
PY  - 2019
SN  - 2071-1050
DO  - 10.3390/su11205729
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com
AB  - The sharing economy is an emerging niche for innovation capable of disrupting established socio-technical and economic regimes. Because of this potential to cause radical changes in a wide array of domains, research in multiple disciplines addressing various aspects entailing this phenomenon is proliferating. In this emerging body of literature, the understanding and framing of the sharing economy are often different. Without knowledge about the current state of the research related to the sharing economy, delineating research trends, gaps, and needs for directing effectively primary research are not possible. This study aimed to synthesize the state and distribution of existing publications related to the sharing economy in multiple disciplines. We used the systematic mapping technique to scope, identify, and classify the publications at a fine level of granularity. We reviewed 589 journal articles (published from 1978 to 2017), and 454 met the selection criteria. The journal articles reviewed were published in 284 different journals. Intriguingly, 15 journals published five to 13 publications each and 221 journals had a single article about the topic. Journals belonging to the subject areas “business, management and accounting” (42.1%) and “social sciences” (35.2%) published more than 70% of the reviewed publications. Accommodation (19.8%) and car and ridesharing (17.2%) were the two most prominent sectors; 50.2% of the publications addressed C2C transactions (10.6% B2C, 24.4% more than one type); 62.3% were about accessing resources, and 5.1% concerned transfer of ownership (i.e., second-hand or donation); and 19.2% covered access and transfer of ownership simultaneously. While empirical studies were the majority (53.1%, when comparing with conceptual ones), qualitative approaches were most common (51.5% against 24.9% quantitative and 17.4% mixed methods). Literature review (22.9%), survey (13.2%), case study (7.3%) and interview (7%) were the most frequently used methods. User behavior (26.4%), business models and organizational aspects (22.7%), institution and governance system (18.7%), conceptualization matters (17%), and sustainability evaluation (15.3%) are research clusters identified from a grounded approach. The link between user behavior and net environmental impacts of sharing options was the largest gap found in the research needing attention from a sustainability perspective. Accordingly, multidisciplinary investigations quantifying behavioral root causes, magnitude, and likelihood of environmental rebound effects using real-world data are strongly encouraged.
ER  -