Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
F. Cipriano, Pereira, L. & Lopes da Costa, R. (2020). Agile Project and Portfolio Management: A Systematic Literature Review. ESGHT/ISCAL – XI PostGraduate Conference in Management, Hospitality and Tourism.
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
F. Cipriano et al.,  "Agile Project and Portfolio Management: A Systematic Literature Review", in ESGHT/ISCAL – XI PostGraduate Conf. in Management, Hospitality and Tourism, Faro, 2020
Exportar BibTeX 
@null{cipriano2020_1714986561267,
	year = "2020",
	url = "https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/publications/agile-project-and-portfolio-management-a-systematic-literature-review/77615?lang=en"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - GEN
TI  - Agile Project and Portfolio Management: A Systematic Literature Review
T2  - ESGHT/ISCAL – XI PostGraduate Conference in Management, Hospitality and Tourism
AU  - F. Cipriano
AU  - Pereira, L.
AU  - Lopes da Costa, R.
PY  - 2020
CY  - Faro
UR  - https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/publications/agile-project-and-portfolio-management-a-systematic-literature-review/77615?lang=en
AB  - The application of Agile Methods (AM) in project management has shown great efficiency and remarkable results. However, these methods were born to be applied at team level and not at project portfolio level, where the complexity of managing multiple agile projects and teams leads to several challenges of resource management, priorities and governance model of the project portfolio. The systematic literature review performed in this research aims to identify which practices are the most appropriate to manage the challenges associated with Agile Portfolio Management (APM) and which is the most appropriate context. previous research leaded by Dikert et al. (2016), where the success factors and challenges for large-scale transformations were identified, served as inspiration to create the different dimensions of the techniques that were identified. It was also considered the domains of practice that enable agility outside individual projects, identified in the research conducted by Stettina & Hörz (2015). The dimensions of the two studies mentioned above were considered and techniques and best practices collected in this literature review were classified into 4 APM dimensions: Coordination, Project and resource prioritization, Agility and Change Management. A typification of each technique and best practice was also created where we can typify by: Artifact, Event, Structure, Process, Roles and Principles.
Research.
ER  -