Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA)
Bai, X., Ramos, M. & Fiske, S. (2020). As diversity increases, people paradoxically perceive social groups as more similar. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 117 (23), 12741-1274
Exportar Referência (IEEE)
X. Bai et al.,  "As diversity increases, people paradoxically perceive social groups as more similar", in Proc. of the Nat. Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 117, no. 23, pp. 12741-1274, 2020
Exportar BibTeX
@article{bai2020_1714794358385,
	author = "Bai, X. and Ramos, M. and Fiske, S.",
	title = "As diversity increases, people paradoxically perceive social groups as more similar",
	journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
	year = "2020",
	volume = "117",
	number = "23",
	doi = "10.1073/pnas.2000333117",
	pages = "12741-1274",
	url = "https://www.pnas.org/page/about"
}
Exportar RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - As diversity increases, people paradoxically perceive social groups as more similar
T2  - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
VL  - 117
IS  - 23
AU  - Bai, X.
AU  - Ramos, M.
AU  - Fiske, S.
PY  - 2020
SP  - 12741-1274
SN  - 0027-8424
DO  - 10.1073/pnas.2000333117
UR  - https://www.pnas.org/page/about
AB  - With globalization and immigration, societal contexts differ in sheer variety of resident social groups. Social diversity challenges individuals to think in new ways about new kinds of people and where their groups all stand, relative to each other. However, psychological science does not yet specify how human minds represent social diversity, in homogeneous or heterogenous contexts. Mental maps of the array of society’s groups should differ when individuals inhabit more and less diverse ecologies. Nonetheless, predictions disagree on how they should differ. Confirmation bias suggests more diversity means more stereotype dispersion: With increased exposure, perceivers’ mental maps might differentiate more among groups, so their stereotypes would spread out (disperse). In contrast, individuation suggests more diversity means less stereotype dispersion, as perceivers experience within-group variety and between-group overlap. Worldwide, nationwide, individual, and longitudinal datasets (n = 12,011) revealed a diversity paradox: More diversity consistently meant less stereotype dispersion. Both contextual and perceived ethnic diversity correlate with decreased stereotype dispersion. Countries and US states with higher levels of ethnic diversity (e.g., South Africa and Hawaii, versus South Korea and Vermont), online individuals who perceive more ethnic diversity, and students who moved to more ethnically diverse colleges mentally represent ethnic groups as more similar to each other, on warmth and competence stereotypes. Homogeneity shows more-differentiated stereotypes; ironically, those with the least exposure have the most-distinct stereotypes. Diversity means less-differentiated stereotypes, as in the melting pot metaphor. Diversity and reduced dispersion also correlate positively with subjective wellbeing.
ER  -