Exportar Publicação
A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.
Marques-Quinteiro, P., Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J., Navarro, J., Passos, A. M. & Curral, L. (2021). The rough journey to success: Examining the nonlinear dynamics of processes and performance in teams. Nonlinear Dynamis, Psychology, and Life Sciences. 25 (1), 69-91
P. M. Silva et al., "The rough journey to success: Examining the nonlinear dynamics of processes and performance in teams", in Nonlinear Dynamis, Psychology, and Life Sciences, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 69-91, 2021
@article{silva2021_1734883426398, author = "Marques-Quinteiro, P. and Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J. and Navarro, J. and Passos, A. M. and Curral, L.", title = "The rough journey to success: Examining the nonlinear dynamics of processes and performance in teams", journal = "Nonlinear Dynamis, Psychology, and Life Sciences", year = "2021", volume = "25", number = "1", pages = "69-91", url = "https://societyforchaostheory.org/ndpls/" }
TY - JOUR TI - The rough journey to success: Examining the nonlinear dynamics of processes and performance in teams T2 - Nonlinear Dynamis, Psychology, and Life Sciences VL - 25 IS - 1 AU - Marques-Quinteiro, P. AU - Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J. AU - Navarro, J. AU - Passos, A. M. AU - Curral, L. PY - 2021 SP - 69-91 SN - 1090-0578 UR - https://societyforchaostheory.org/ndpls/ AB - We build on Nonlinear Dynamic Systems (NDS) theory to examine if team performance change across a complete performance cycle is nonlinear, and if such change is related with team processes change over time. Participants were 214 teams enrolled in one management competition. The hypotheses were tested using nonlinear regressions and catastrophe modeling. The results of the nonlinear regression model support the hypothesis that change in team performance over time follows a cusp catastrophe distribution, R2Cusp = .93, F(5, 1065) = 16889.82, p < .001; and that team processes do function as asymmetry (transition and action processes) and bifurcation (interpersonal processes) factors. The results also suggest that the cusp catastrophe model (R2 = .68) explains team performance better than the linear (R2 = .05) and logistic models (R2 = .07). This study reiterates the importance of incorporating the NDS perspective within the teamwork literature to leverage our knowledge about the way teams perform over time. ER -