Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Ylönen, A. (2021). Positivism or understanding? The complexity of analyzing the objectives of armed opposition groups. Critical Review. 33 (1), 128-144
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
A. E. Ylönen,  "Positivism or understanding? The complexity of analyzing the objectives of armed opposition groups", in Critical Review, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 128-144, 2021
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{ylönen2021_1734832375821,
	author = "Ylönen, A.",
	title = "Positivism or understanding? The complexity of analyzing the objectives of armed opposition groups",
	journal = "Critical Review",
	year = "2021",
	volume = "33",
	number = "1",
	doi = "10.1080/08913811.2021.1899665",
	pages = "128-144",
	url = "https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rcri20/current"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Positivism or understanding? The complexity of analyzing the objectives of armed opposition groups
T2  - Critical Review
VL  - 33
IS  - 1
AU  - Ylönen, A.
PY  - 2021
SP  - 128-144
SN  - 0891-3811
DO  - 10.1080/08913811.2021.1899665
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rcri20/current
AB  - The analysis of armed opposition groups is heavily tainted by gross categorizations and labeling. Using vague terms that reduce the objectives of such groups to a uniform binary of secessionist or reformist defies their ideational complexity, undermining the effort to gain a nuanced and in-depth understanding of their actual motives. A closer look into the Ogaden National Liberation Front in Ethiopia reveals the type of complexity we might expect to find in armed opposition groups’ objectives, and thus the problem with superficially labeling them to make for easy comparative analyses.
ER  -