Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Santos Alexandre, R. (2022). The interval between humans: A probe into the possibilities of being. Culture and Psychology. 28 (1), 65-87
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
R. F. Alexandre,  "The interval between humans: A probe into the possibilities of being", in Culture and Psychology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 65-87, 2022
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{alexandre2022_1720120503061,
	author = "Santos Alexandre, R.",
	title = "The interval between humans: A probe into the possibilities of being",
	journal = "Culture and Psychology",
	year = "2022",
	volume = "28",
	number = "1",
	doi = "10.1177/1354067X211017307",
	pages = "65-87",
	url = "https://journals.sagepub.com/home/cap"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The interval between humans: A probe into the possibilities of being
T2  - Culture and Psychology
VL  - 28
IS  - 1
AU  - Santos Alexandre, R.
PY  - 2022
SP  - 65-87
SN  - 1354-067X
DO  - 10.1177/1354067X211017307
UR  - https://journals.sagepub.com/home/cap
AB  - By taking as background a few examples from Japanese culture and society, as well as an ethnographic insight, this article reconsiders the way anthropology usually deals with and talks about issues regarding cultural differences in human relations. These issues, which start from the fact that different cultures articulate human relations in different ways, have as one of their main theoretical outcomes the analysis around the categories of “self” or “person.” However, within this move lies something akin to a “gestalt misconception” that reduces a shared moral understanding (human relations) to an analysis of conceptual categories and their cognitive, psychological, subjective (or other) processes. Alternatively, the article proposes a more dialogical approach informed by Gadamer’s idea of “dialog” and “fusion of horizons,” where one aims to learn from other cultures and not about them. As a result, some reflections of a philosophical, moral, and practical character are presented, leaving theoretical formulations about the “Japanese self” out of the equation. This article’s general purpose is not an exploration of “Japaneseness,” but rather a probe into the possibilities of Being.
ER  -