Exportar Publicação
A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.
Santos, A. T. & Mendonça, S. (2021). Watching over innovation studies: Profiling the gatekeepers. In Glänzel, W., Heeffer, S., Chi, P.-S., and Rousseau, R. (Ed.), 18th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. (pp. 1537-1538). Leuven: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.
A. T. Santos and S. M. Mendonça, "Watching over innovation studies: Profiling the gatekeepers", in 18th Int. Conf. of the Int. Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Glänzel, W., Heeffer, S., Chi, P.-S., and Rousseau, R., Ed., Leuven, International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 2021, pp. 1537-1538
@inproceedings{santos2021_1732206934505, author = "Santos, A. T. and Mendonça, S.", title = "Watching over innovation studies: Profiling the gatekeepers", booktitle = "18th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics", year = "2021", editor = "Glänzel, W., Heeffer, S., Chi, P.-S., and Rousseau, R.", volume = "", number = "", series = "", pages = "1537-1538", publisher = "International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics", address = "Leuven", organization = "ISSI", url = "https://www.issi-society.org/publications/issi-conference-proceedings/proceedings-of-issi-2021/" }
TY - CPAPER TI - Watching over innovation studies: Profiling the gatekeepers T2 - 18th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics AU - Santos, A. T. AU - Mendonça, S. PY - 2021 SP - 1537-1538 SN - 2175-1935 CY - Leuven UR - https://www.issi-society.org/publications/issi-conference-proceedings/proceedings-of-issi-2021/ AB - Academic serials (especially peer-reviewed journals) play a very critical role in the scientific ecosystem and both integrity and independence are perceived as essential for good editorial governance (Rynes, 2006). For being responsible for articles selection (Bedeian et al., 2009; Feldman, 2008), elite board membership ensures the scientific quality of publications and “occupy key roles as opinion formers, gatekeepers and arbiters of disciplinary values” (Burgess and Shaw, 2010, p.630). So far, board elites have not been subject to a scrutiny proportional to their decision power (Burgess & Shaw, 2010) and an overall lack of transparency has been reported about the general editorial process despite of being actual gatekeepers (Miner, 2003; see also Bedeian et al., 2009; Horan et al., 1993). ER -