Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Guinote, A. & Kim, K-H (2022). Cheating to win or not to lose: Power and situational framing affect unethical behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 52 (3), 137-144
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
A. P. Guinote and K. Kim,  "Cheating to win or not to lose: Power and situational framing affect unethical behavior", in Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 137-144, 2022
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{guinote2022_1784274224311,
	author = "Guinote, A. and Kim, K-H",
	title = "Cheating to win or not to lose: Power and situational framing affect unethical behavior",
	journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
	year = "2022",
	volume = "52",
	number = "3",
	doi = "10.1111/jasp.12852",
	pages = "137-144",
	url = "https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15591816"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cheating to win or not to lose: Power and situational framing affect unethical behavior
T2  - Journal of Applied Social Psychology
VL  - 52
IS  - 3
AU  - Guinote, A.
AU  - Kim, K-H
PY  - 2022
SP  - 137-144
SN  - 0021-9029
DO  - 10.1111/jasp.12852
UR  - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15591816
AB  - Power has long been associated with corruption, yet most evidence has been linked to abuses for gains (money, resources, sex). In this article, we propose a conceptual framework that considers unethical conduct to obtain gains and to avoid losses. Following the situated focus theory of power (Guinote, 2007), we propose that power flexibly orients individuals’ cognitions and efforts in line with active goals. Under a gains frame, compared to the powerless, the powerful should be more motivated to obtain gains and cheat more, in order to protect these gains. Under a loss frame, the powerful should experience a temporary activation of loss aversion goals, while the powerless should experience a chronic activation of loss aversion goals. Consequently, power differences in corruption levels should only occur for gains and not when losses are at stake. The effects of power and frame were demonstrated in one study (N = 321). The findings provided initial evidence supporting the notion that an understanding of the effects of power on corruption necessitates a consideration of contextual framing.
ER  -