Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Uzelgun, M., Fernandes-Jesus, M. & Küçükural, O. (2022). Reception of climate activist messages by low-carbon transition actors: argument evasion in the carbon offsetting debate. Argumentation and Advocacy. 58 (2), 102-122
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
M. A. Uzelgun et al.,  "Reception of climate activist messages by low-carbon transition actors: argument evasion in the carbon offsetting debate", in Argumentation and Advocacy, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 102-122, 2022
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{uzelgun2022_1732211931873,
	author = "Uzelgun, M. and Fernandes-Jesus, M. and Küçükural, O.",
	title = "Reception of climate activist messages by low-carbon transition actors: argument evasion in the carbon offsetting debate",
	journal = "Argumentation and Advocacy",
	year = "2022",
	volume = "58",
	number = "2",
	doi = "10.1080/10511431.2021.1971381",
	pages = "102-122",
	url = "https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/rafa20"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Reception of climate activist messages by low-carbon transition actors: argument evasion in the carbon offsetting debate
T2  - Argumentation and Advocacy
VL  - 58
IS  - 2
AU  - Uzelgun, M.
AU  - Fernandes-Jesus, M.
AU  - Küçükural, O.
PY  - 2022
SP  - 102-122
SN  - 1051-1431
DO  - 10.1080/10511431.2021.1971381
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/rafa20
AB  - How do adherents to hegemonic discourses construe and respond to radical arguments by activists? To address the question, we examined how adherents to hegemonic climate change discourses react to a climate activist’s arguments. In interviews conducted with corporate actors of low-carbon transitions, we used a video excerpt to elicit critical reactions to an activist’s argumentation on carbon offsetting. We used the critical reactions as an index of interviewees’ reception of the activist’s case and pragma-dialectical theory to analyze them. We found that interviewees advanced four types of criticism concerning individual agency, awareness-raising, neutralization, and financial instruments. We discuss their inter-relations and how interviewees construed the activist’s argumentation in ways that evaded his more antagonistic claims. 
ER  -