Exportar Publicação
A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.
Garrido, M., Garcia-Marques, L., Hamilton, D. & Ferreira, M. (2006). Collaborative impression formation and recall of impression-relevant information. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp. 1358-1363). Vancouver, BC, Canada: University of California.
M. E. Garrido et al., "Collaborative impression formation and recall of impression-relevant information", in Proc. of the Annu. Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, BC, Canada, University of California, 2006, vol. 28, pp. 1358-1363
@inproceedings{garrido2006_1737719973361, author = "Garrido, M. and Garcia-Marques, L. and Hamilton, D. and Ferreira, M.", title = "Collaborative impression formation and recall of impression-relevant information", booktitle = "Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society", year = "2006", editor = "", volume = "28", number = "", series = "", pages = "1358-1363", publisher = "University of California", address = "Vancouver, BC, Canada", organization = "Cognitive Science Society", url = "https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0cq9v8x7" }
TY - CPAPER TI - Collaborative impression formation and recall of impression-relevant information T2 - Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society VL - 28 AU - Garrido, M. AU - Garcia-Marques, L. AU - Hamilton, D. AU - Ferreira, M. PY - 2006 SP - 1358-1363 CY - Vancouver, BC, Canada UR - https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0cq9v8x7 AB - The present research examines how the match between encoding and recall contexts influences recall performance. Memory research has shown that recall performance can be impaired when a subset of the studied stimuli is presented at recall (the part-set cuing effect) or when the recall process is carried out in a collaborative way (collaborative inhibition effect). In 4 experiments we manipulated the degree of match between item organization at encoding and at retrieval, either by manipulating: the organization of part-set cues (exp. 1); the organization of the information provided at encoding to participants of the same collaborative recall sessions (exp. 2); or the nature of the encoding conditions (collaborative vs. non-collaborative; exp. 3 and 4). Results stress the parallel between both effects showing that mismatching encoding organization cues provided at test (by the experimenter or by other collaborative group members), impair recall considerably when compared to no cues or matching encoding organization cues. We present a theoretical account for the reported result pattern - the principle of associative recapitulation. ER -