Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA)
Costa Agarez, R., Floré, F. & Devos, R. (2022). The puzzle of architecture and bureaucracy. Architectural History. 65, 1-20
Exportar Referência (IEEE)
R. M. Agarez et al.,  "The puzzle of architecture and bureaucracy", in Architectural History, vol. 65, pp. 1-20, 2022
Exportar BibTeX
@article{agarez2022_1714854148506,
	author = "Costa Agarez, R. and Floré, F. and Devos, R.",
	title = "The puzzle of architecture and bureaucracy",
	journal = "Architectural History",
	year = "2022",
	volume = "65",
	number = "",
	doi = "10.1017/arh.2022.1",
	pages = "1-20",
	url = "https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/architectural-history/article/puzzle-of-architecture-and-bureaucracy/58275A74AC98FAD9A9B4C6E71D108CDD"
}
Exportar RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The puzzle of architecture and bureaucracy
T2  - Architectural History
VL  - 65
AU  - Costa Agarez, R.
AU  - Floré, F.
AU  - Devos, R.
PY  - 2022
SP  - 1-20
SN  - 0066-622X
DO  - 10.1017/arh.2022.1
UR  - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/architectural-history/article/puzzle-of-architecture-and-bureaucracy/58275A74AC98FAD9A9B4C6E71D108CDD
AB  - Architecture and bureaucracy: indissociable and irreconcilable? The two spheres are often seen in opposition — the latter curtailing the former’s creative power — yet might they not also overlap, partake and occasionally coincide in their processes? Dismissing the role of bureaucracy in architecture as extraneous or detrimental seems to hinder our capacity, as thinkers and producers of architecture, to work through this relationship and explore ways of dealing with a pervasive tool of contemporary societal organisation; whereas understanding the fraught relationship might help us bridge the gap that, in many contexts, separates architecture and the communities it exists to serve. This special collection explores how architecture and bureaucracy have negotiated their stances in the twentieth century. In particular, it aims to shed light on instances where knowledge of architecture was an element in, and a product of, the machinery of bureaucracy. Beyond the notion of bureaucracy in architecture as a site of imposition and control — and the vivid sentiments of frustration and deception it prompts — lies a terrain where less contrasted, more fine-grained actions and exchanges occur. The ways in which these two spheres relate are diverse and merit scholarly attention, as the articles that follow demonstrate.
ER  -