Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Fasoli, F., Maass, A. & Berghella, L. (2023). Who has a better auditory gaydar? Sexual orientation categorization by heterosexual and lesbian, gay and bisexual people. Journal of Homosexuality. 70 (5), 876-899
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
F. Fasoli et al.,  "Who has a better auditory gaydar? Sexual orientation categorization by heterosexual and lesbian, gay and bisexual people", in Journal of Homosexuality, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 876-899, 2023
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{fasoli2023_1783060219966,
	author = "Fasoli, F. and Maass, A. and Berghella, L.",
	title = "Who has a better auditory gaydar? Sexual orientation categorization by heterosexual and lesbian, gay and bisexual people",
	journal = "Journal of Homosexuality",
	year = "2023",
	volume = "70",
	number = "5",
	doi = "10.1080/00918369.2021.2004796",
	pages = "876-899",
	url = "https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00918369.2021.2004796"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Who has a better auditory gaydar? Sexual orientation categorization by heterosexual and lesbian, gay and bisexual people
T2  - Journal of Homosexuality
VL  - 70
IS  - 5
AU  - Fasoli, F.
AU  - Maass, A.
AU  - Berghella, L.
PY  - 2023
SP  - 876-899
SN  - 0091-8369
DO  - 10.1080/00918369.2021.2004796
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00918369.2021.2004796
AB  - Lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) people are supposed to be better at gaydar than heterosexual. Across two studies we examined auditory gaydar performed by LGB and heterosexual listeners. In Study 1 participants (n = 127) listened to male and female speakers (n = 10) and judged their sexual orientation on a binary choice (gay/lesbian vs. heterosexual). In Study 2, participants (n = 192) judged speakers’ (n = 31) sexual orientation on a Kinsey-like scale (1 = exclusively heterosexual, 7 = exclusively gay/lesbian). Results showed gaydar judgments differences in relative terms that did not indicate an overall gaydar accuracy. Moreover, LGB participants were not better at gaydar than heterosexual participants but rather showed a shift in criterion when making auditory gaydar judgments, namely they report a weaker straight categorization bias. Overall, these findings contribute to the understanding of sexual orientation categorization among heterosexual majority and LGB minority groups.
ER  -