Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA)
Rodrigues, D. L., Aybar Camposano, G., Lopes, D. & Aleksandra Huic (2022). MONOMORMATIVITY VS HETERONORMATIVITY: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PERCEPTION OF PARTNERS IN A RELATIONSHIP. International Conference on LGBT+ Psychology and Related Fields.
Exportar Referência (IEEE)
D. F. Rodrigues et al.,  "MONOMORMATIVITY VS HETERONORMATIVITY: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PERCEPTION OF PARTNERS IN A RELATIONSHIP", in Int. Conf. on LGBT+ Psychology and Related Fields, Lisbon, 2022
Exportar BibTeX
@misc{rodrigues2022_1777312638825,
	author = "Rodrigues, D. L. and Aybar Camposano, G. and Lopes, D. and Aleksandra Huic",
	title = "MONOMORMATIVITY VS HETERONORMATIVITY: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PERCEPTION OF PARTNERS IN A RELATIONSHIP",
	year = "2022",
	howpublished = "Digital",
	url = "https://www.ispa.pt/agenda/eventos/international-conference-on-lgbt-psychology-and-related-fields/"
}
Exportar RIS
TY  - CPAPER
TI  - MONOMORMATIVITY VS HETERONORMATIVITY: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PERCEPTION OF PARTNERS IN A RELATIONSHIP
T2  - International Conference on LGBT+ Psychology and Related Fields
AU  - Rodrigues, D. L.
AU  - Aybar Camposano, G.
AU  - Lopes, D.
AU  - Aleksandra Huic
PY  - 2022
CY  - Lisbon
UR  - https://www.ispa.pt/agenda/eventos/international-conference-on-lgbt-psychology-and-related-fields/
AB  - People stigmatize others that deviate from normative behaviors in relationships.
However, recent evidence showed that romantic partners in consensual nonmonogamous
(CNM) relationships are dehumanized, when compared to their monogamous
counterparts. Interestingly, this dehumanization occurred regardless of whether partners
were heterosexual or in a same-sex male relationship. We aimed to further understand
these findings by examining how people perceive relationship dynamics, morality and
values underlying these relationships. We conducted an experimental study with 181
heterosexual Portuguese adults (151 women; Mage = 28.90, SD = 10.11) and asked
participants to read the description of two people in a relationship using a 3 Relationship
agreement (monogamous vs. open relationship vs. polyamorous) x 2 Sexual orientation
of the partners (same-sex male vs heterosexual) between-subjects design. After reading
the description, participants were asked to make a series of judgments about both partners:
likelihood of engaging in unsafe sex behaviors, morality and values. Results showed
differences according to relationship agreement. Specifically, CNM (vs. monogamous)
partners were perceived as less moral (honest, sincere and confident), as having higher
incidences of sexual transmitted infections, and as using condoms more frequently. These
partners were also attributed more individual values (e.g., hedonism, stimulation) and less
traditional ones. There were also differences according to the sexual orientation of the
partners. Same-sex male (vs. heterosexual) partners were attributed more values overall
(e.g., achievement, universalism. No interaction between both factors emerged in either
dependent measure. Overall, this study extended findings from the dehumanization
literature and showed that stigmatization based on deviations from mononormativity
overcome the stigmatization based on deviations from heteronormativity.
ER  -