Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Castro, P., Brondi, S. & Contarello, A. (2022). Battles of Ideas between the legal and the legitimate: sSudying change and continuity in sustainability and ecological issues. In Alberta Contarello (Ed.), Embracing change: Knowledge, continuity, and social representations. (pp. 145-161).: Oxford University Press.
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
F. P. Castro et al.,  "Battles of Ideas between the legal and the legitimate: sSudying change and continuity in sustainability and ecological issues", in Embracing change: Knowledge, continuity, and social representations, Alberta Contarello, Ed., Oxford University Press, 2022, pp. 145-161
Exportar BibTeX 
@incollection{castro2022_1714654942443,
	author = "Castro, P. and Brondi, S. and Contarello, A.",
	title = "Battles of Ideas between the legal and the legitimate: sSudying change and continuity in sustainability and ecological issues",
	chapter = "",
	booktitle = "Embracing change: Knowledge, continuity, and social representations",
	year = "2022",
	volume = "",
	series = "",
	edition = "",
	pages = "145-145",
	publisher = "Oxford University Press",
	address = "",
	url = "https://academic.oup.com/book/39003/chapter-abstract/338263492?redirectedFrom=fulltext"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - CHAP
TI  - Battles of Ideas between the legal and the legitimate: sSudying change and continuity in sustainability and ecological issues
T2  - Embracing change: Knowledge, continuity, and social representations
AU  - Castro, P.
AU  - Brondi, S.
AU  - Contarello, A.
PY  - 2022
SP  - 145-161
DO  - 10.1093/oso/9780197617366.003.0007
UR  - https://academic.oup.com/book/39003/chapter-abstract/338263492?redirectedFrom=fulltext
AB  - This chapter discusses how social psychology can offer theoretical contributions for a better understanding of the relations between the institutional and public spheres and how this may impact change in ecological matters. First, it introduces the difference between natural and agreed—or chosen—limits to human action and draws on Sophocles’s Antigone to illustrate this and discuss how legitimacy has roots in the many heterogeneous values of the public sphere/consensual universe, while legality arises from the institutional/reified sphere. Recalling some empirical research in the area of social studies of sustainability, it then shows how a social representations perspective can help us understand the dynamic and interdependent relations between the institutional or reified sphere and the consensual or common sense universe—and their implications for social change and continuity.
ER  -