Export Publication

The publication can be exported in the following formats: APA (American Psychological Association) reference format, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) reference format, BibTeX and RIS.

Export Reference (APA) 
Oruç, R., Uzelgun, M. & Sadek, K. (2023). Sequencing critical moves for ethical argumentation practice: Munāẓara and the interdependence of procedure and agent. Informal Logic. 43 (1), 113-137
Export Reference (IEEE) 
R. Oruç et al.,  "Sequencing critical moves for ethical argumentation practice: Munāẓara and the interdependence of procedure and agent", in Informal Logic, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 113-137, 2023
Export BibTeX 
@article{oruç2023_1716179509526,
	author = "Oruç, R. and Uzelgun, M. and Sadek, K.",
	title = "Sequencing critical moves for ethical argumentation practice: Munāẓara and the interdependence of procedure and agent",
	journal = "Informal Logic",
	year = "2023",
	volume = "43",
	number = "1",
	doi = "10.22329/il.v43i1.7073",
	pages = "113-137",
	url = "https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/7073"
}
Export RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Sequencing critical moves for ethical argumentation practice: Munāẓara and the interdependence of procedure and agent
T2  - Informal Logic
VL  - 43
IS  - 1
AU  - Oruç, R.
AU  - Uzelgun, M.
AU  - Sadek, K.
PY  - 2023
SP  - 113-137
SN  - 2293-734X
DO  - 10.22329/il.v43i1.7073
UR  - https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/7073
AB  - The aim of this paper is to highlight an interdependence between procedural and agential norms that undermines their neat separation when appraising argumentation. Drawing on the munāẓara tradition, we carve a space for sequencing in argumentation scholarship. Focusing on the antagonist’s sequencing of critical moves, we identify each sequence’s corresponding values of argumentation: coalescence, reliability, and efficacy. These values arise through the mediation of virtues and simultaneously underpin procedural as well as agential norms. Consequently, an ambiguity between procedure and agent becomes apparent. This ambiguity hints at the potential for a virtue theory of argumentation that draws on procedural norms.
ER  -