Exportar Publicação
A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.
Rodrigues, D. L. (2023). Focusing on safety or pleasure determine condom use intentions differently depending on condom availability and STI risk. International Journal of Sexual Health. 35 (3), 341-351
D. F. Rodrigues, "Focusing on safety or pleasure determine condom use intentions differently depending on condom availability and STI risk", in Int. Journal of Sexual Health, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 341-351, 2023
@article{rodrigues2023_1731950394250, author = "Rodrigues, D. L.", title = "Focusing on safety or pleasure determine condom use intentions differently depending on condom availability and STI risk", journal = "International Journal of Sexual Health", year = "2023", volume = "35", number = "3", doi = "10.1080/19317611.2023.2212651", pages = "341-351", url = "https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19317611.2023.2212651?journalCode=wijs20" }
TY - JOUR TI - Focusing on safety or pleasure determine condom use intentions differently depending on condom availability and STI risk T2 - International Journal of Sexual Health VL - 35 IS - 3 AU - Rodrigues, D. L. PY - 2023 SP - 341-351 SN - 1931-7611 DO - 10.1080/19317611.2023.2212651 UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19317611.2023.2212651?journalCode=wijs20 AB - Regulatory Focus Theory suggests that goal pursuit is driven by two separate and fundamental motives. Being more focused on prevention motivates people to enact safer behaviors and avoid negative outcomes (e.g., to prevent diseases), whereas being more focused on promotion motivates people to take risks and pursue pleasurable experiences (e.g., condomless sex). A quasi-experimental study (N = 476) examined if differences in regulatory focus (i.e., prevention vs. promotion) determined condom use intentions with a prospective casual partner, depending on condom availability delay and STI risk cues. Participants focused on prevention (vs. promotion) were less likely to consider having condomless sex across condom availability delays conditions. However, STI risk cues changed condom use intentions. When STI risk was lower, condom use intentions decreased as condom availability delays increased (particularly for participants focused on promotion). When STI risk was higher, condom use intentions were stronger and consistent across condom availability delays (particularly for participants focused on prevention). These findings highlight the importance of distinct sexual motives when examining sexual health practices. ER -