Scientific journal paper Q1
A randomized control trial of MuST for vascular access cannulation in hemodialysis patients: Contributions for a safe nursing intervention
Ricardo Peralta (Peralta, R.); Rafaela Rocha (Rocha, R.); Ana Sofia Dias (Dias, A. S.); João Fazendeiro Matos (Matos, J. F.); Pedro Ponce (Ponce, P.); Ana Bernardo (Bernardo, A.); Anna Wammi (Wammi, A.); Manuela Stauss-Grabo (Stauss-Grabo, M.); Stefano Stuard (Stuard, S.); Marjelka Trkulja (Trkulja, M.); Helena Carvalho (Carvalho, H.); Oscar Dias (Dias, O.); Filipe Cristóvão (Cristóvão, F.); et al.
Journal Title
Kidney Medicine
Year (definitive publication)
2026
Language
English
Country
United States of America
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 0

(Last checked: 2026-05-30 00:23)

View record in Web of Science®

Scopus

Times Cited: 1

(Last checked: 2026-05-28 00:19)

View record in Scopus

Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Overton

Abstract
Functioning vascular access (VA) is crucial to patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis. Repeated cannulation of the VA increases the risk of complications, thereby compromising its survival. Although VA is not free of complications, guidelines recommend the rope-ladder (RL) cannulation technique. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of 101 renal patients receiving hemodialysis who required an arteriovenous fistula comparing the multiple single cannulation Technique (MuST) with the RL technique, to assess their survival and complications for 12 months. We found a low incidence in the development of aneurysms in the MuST group, but we were unable to demonstrate a difference in arteriovenous fistula survival between MuST and RL. Further studies are required to determine the benefits and patient safety of MuST.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Arteriovenous fistula,Cannulation,Hemodialysis,MuST,Pain,Randomized control trial,Rope-ladder,Vascular access
  • Clinical Medicine - Medical and Health Sciences