Artigo em revista científica Q1
Comparison of artificial intelligence and semi-empirical methodologies for estimation of coverage in mobile networks
Daniel Fernandes (Fernandes, D.); António Raimundo (Raimundo, A.); Prof. Francisco Cercas (Cercas, F.); Pedro Sebastião (Sebastião, P.); Rui Dinis (Dinis, R.); Ferreira, Lucio Studer (Ferreira, L. S.);
Título Revista
IEEE Access
Ano (publicação definitiva)
2020
Língua
Inglês
País
Estados Unidos da América
Mais Informação
Web of Science®

N.º de citações: 9

(Última verificação: 2024-11-20 18:09)

Ver o registo na Web of Science®


: 0.6
Scopus

N.º de citações: 14

(Última verificação: 2024-11-19 20:13)

Ver o registo na Scopus


: 0.8
Google Scholar

N.º de citações: 20

(Última verificação: 2024-11-19 06:03)

Ver o registo no Google Scholar

Abstract/Resumo
To help telecommunication operators in their network planning, namely coverage estimation and optimisation tasks, this article presents a comparison between a semi-empirical propagation model and a propagation model generated using Artificial Intelligence (AI). These two types of propagation models are quite different in their design. The semi-empiric Automatically Calibrated Standard Propagation Model (ACSPM) is specific for an operating antenna, being calibrated every time a use case application is used and the Artificial Intelligence Propagation Model (AIPM) can be applied in different scenarios, once trained, allowing to estimate coverage for a new antenna location, using information from neighboring antennas. These models have quite different features and applicability. The ACSPM should be applied in network optimisation, when using data from the current state of the antennas. The AIPM can be used in the deployment of new antennas, as it uses data from a certain geographical area. For a better comparison of the models studied, extensive Drive Tests (DT) collection campaigns conducted by operators are used, since coverage estimations are more realistic when DTs are considered. Both models are generated using very different methodologies, but their resulting performance is very similar. The AIPM achieves a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) up to 6.1 dB with a standard deviation of 4 dB. When compared to the ACSPM we have an improvement of 0.5 dB, since this only achieves a MAE up to 6.6 dB. AIPM achieves better results and is the characterised for being completely agnostic and definition-free, when compared with known propagation models.
Agradecimentos/Acknowledgements
--
Palavras-chave
Coverage estimation,Network planning,Drive tests,Measurements,Propagation model,Artificial intelligence
  • Ciências da Computação e da Informação - Ciências Naturais
  • Outras Ciências Naturais - Ciências Naturais
  • Engenharia Civil - Engenharia e Tecnologia
  • Engenharia Eletrotécnica, Eletrónica e Informática - Engenharia e Tecnologia
  • Engenharia dos Materiais - Engenharia e Tecnologia
Registos de financiamentos
Referência de financiamento Entidade Financiadora
023304 Comissão Europeia
UIDB/04111/2020 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
UIDB/50008/2020 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia