Scientific journal paper Q1
Control over the association of power and size
Thomas Schubert (Schubert, T. W.); Sven Waldzus (Waldzus, S.); Steffen R. Giessner (Giessner, S. R.);
Journal Title
Social Cognition
Year (definitive publication)
2009
Language
English
Country
United States of America
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 103

(Last checked: 2025-12-21 16:00)

View record in Web of Science®


: 4.3
Scopus

Times Cited: 85

(Last checked: 2025-12-13 19:48)

View record in Scopus


: 3.3
Google Scholar

Times Cited: 176

(Last checked: 2025-12-18 19:53)

View record in Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Overton

Abstract
The hypothesis that power is mentally represented as size is tested. Using an interference paradigm, two studies show that judgments of the power of groups are influenced by the font size the group labels are written in. Power judgments were slower and less accurate when the font size did not fit the power of the groups. Informing participants about the possible influence of size and its direction decreased the effect on accuracy (Study 1). A high likelihood of incompatible trials and information about it decreased effects on both errors and response latencies given sufficient practice (Study 2). The results suggest that the mental representation of power is associated with size cues, but that this influence can be overcome with information and training.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
  • Psychology - Social Sciences