Scientific journal paper Q1
Cultural differences in vocal emotion recognition: a behavioural and skin conductance study in Portugal and Guinea-Bissau
Gonçalo Cosme (Cosme, G.); Vânia Tavares (Tavares, V. ); Guilherme Nobre (Nobre, G.); César Lima (Lima, C. F.); Rui Sá (Sá, R.); Pedro Joel Rosa (Rosa, P. J.); Diana Prata (Prata, D.); et al.
Journal Title
Psychological Research
Year (definitive publication)
2022
Language
English
Country
Germany
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 10

(Last checked: 2026-07-16 10:46)

View record in Web of Science®


: 1.1
Scopus

Times Cited: 9

(Last checked: 2026-07-09 11:20)

View record in Scopus


: 0.9
Google Scholar

Times Cited: 24

(Last checked: 2026-07-10 13:08)

View record in Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Overton

Abstract
Cross-cultural studies of emotion recognition in nonverbal vocalizations not only support the universality hypothesis for its innate features, but also an in-group advantage for culture-dependent features. Nevertheless, in such studies, differences in socio-economic-educational status have not always been accounted for, with idiomatic translation of emotional concepts being a limitation, and the underlying psychophysiological mechanisms still un-researched. We set out to investigate whether native residents from Guinea-Bissau (West African culture) and Portugal (Western European culture)—matched for socio-economic-educational status, sex and language—varied in behavioural and autonomic system response during emotion recognition of nonverbal vocalizations from Portuguese individuals. Overall, Guinea–Bissauans (as out-group) responded significantly less accurately (corrected p <.05), slower, and showed a trend for higher concomitant skin conductance, compared to Portuguese (as in-group)—findings which may indicate a higher cognitive effort stemming from higher difficulty in discerning emotions from another culture. Specifically, accuracy differences were particularly found for pleasure, amusement, and anger, rather than for sadness, relief or fear. Nevertheless, both cultures recognized all emotions above-chance level. The perceived authenticity, measured for the first time in nonverbal cross-cultural research, in the same vocalizations, retrieved no difference between cultures in accuracy, but still a slower response from the out-group. Lastly, we provide—to our knowledge—a first account of how skin conductance response varies between nonverbally vocalized emotions, with significant differences (p <.05). In sum, we provide behavioural and psychophysiological data, demographically and language-matched, that supports cultural and emotion effects on vocal emotion recognition and perceived authenticity, as well as the universality hypothesis.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
  • Clinical Medicine - Medical and Health Sciences
  • Other Medical Sciences - Medical and Health Sciences
  • Psychology - Social Sciences
  • Other Humanities - Humanities
Funding Records
Funding Reference Funding Entity
FP7-PEOPLE-2013-CIG-631952 Comissão Europeia
292/16 Bial Foundation
IF/00787/2014 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-030907 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
DSAIPA/DS/0065/2018 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
SFRH/BD/148088/2019 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
PD/BD/114460/2016 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
IF/00172/2015 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia