Scientific journal paper Q1
Dual system involvement: A scoping review on the intersection of child welfare and juvenile justice systems
Eunice Magalhães (Magalhães, E.); Keunhye Park (Park, K.); Leonor D'Eça (d'Eça, L.); Nélio Brazão (Brazão, N. );
Journal Title
Child Abuse and Neglect
Year (definitive publication)
2026
Language
English
Country
United States of America
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 0

(Last checked: 2026-07-14 18:36)

View record in Web of Science®

Scopus

Times Cited: 0

(Last checked: 2026-07-01 08:04)

View record in Scopus

Google Scholar

Times Cited: 0

(Last checked: 2026-07-09 23:39)

View record in Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Overton

Abstract
Background Youth involved in both the child welfare and juvenile justice systems represent a highly vulnerable population facing overlapping adversities and complex mental health needs. It is therefore critical to synthesize existing research in ways that inform further research, practice, and policy. This scoping review maps research on dual-system involvement (DSI) and identifies areas requiring further investigation, with particular attention to population characteristics across ecological systems, contributing factors, and youth challenges. Method A comprehensive literature search was conducted in April 2025 across Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO, ProQuest Central, and APA PsycArticles. Inclusion criteria comprised peer-reviewed empirical studies published in English, Portuguese, French or Spanish. This criterion enhances the ecological validity of the review by acknowledging socio-cultural influences. Study selection and screening followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Results A total of 51 studies met the inclusion criteria, all conducted in English-speaking countries (Australia, Canada, United States), which may reflect differences in system structures. Most studies examined individual-level characteristics (e.g., race/ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation), with youth histories of trauma and maltreatment commonly reported. Macrosystemic factors received limited attention, although socioeconomic disadvantage emerged as a key risk factor for DSI. Youth challenges most frequently addressed mental and behavioral health, followed by academic support and housing stability. Conclusions Current research on DSI remains largely framed through a pathogenic lens, with limited attention to strengths-based approaches. Future research should adopt intersectional, ecological, and strengths-focused perspectives across diverse cultural contexts to better inform policy and practice.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Dual system involvement,Child welfare,Juvenile justice,Scoping review
  • Clinical Medicine - Medical and Health Sciences
  • Psychology - Social Sciences
  • Sociology - Social Sciences