“Housing contingencies and perceptions of vulnerability in Lisbon: The volatility of a concept".
Event Title
"Rethinking the volatility of vulnerability against categorical constraints”
Year (definitive publication)
2024
Language
English
Country
Germany
More Information
--
Web of Science®
This publication is not indexed in Web of Science®
Scopus
This publication is not indexed in Scopus
Google Scholar
This publication is not indexed in Google Scholar
This publication is not indexed in Overton
Abstract
This paper will discuss different perceptions of vulnerability from a class perspective to tackle distinct
meanings of what constitutes a precarious life, and how these relate to socio-economic contingencies
and one’s identification as vulnerable. Housing problems are not new in Portugal. However, political
analysts, the media and social movements identify an unprecedented housing crisis, attributing it to
international demand on the Portuguese property market, resulting in a scarcity of available homes
and an unceasing surge in rental prices. The combination of low salaries, job market instability and
high rents has made housing accessibility a critical concern for the Portuguese population, affecting
not only those living in poverty and defined as vulnerable, but also the middle class, and young adults in
particular. This highly educated generational group is experiencing significant challenges in
establishing an independent life. Whether they are staying at home, living in shared houses, or renting
rooms, these arrangements are often perceived as temporary but end up being long-term. The
circumstances of economic and professional instability, combined with difficulties in achieving
independence, contribute to a sense of living a precarious and vulnerable life. What means to be
vulnerable is perceived differently by young middle-class adults and those living in extreme poverty.
The different use and meanings of the same identification category by people from distinct social
economic conjunctures disclose distinctive interpretations of precariousness, deservingness,
aspirations for the future, and processes to overcome their vulnerability. How do these groups
differentiate themselves from each other whilst claiming the same identification category? Are there
disparities in their demands for housing policies? Is the government’s response to these new demands
for protective policies similar to the old ones? If we consider these recent laws as state care, are all
citizens being considered equally deserving of protection.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Português