Review article Q1
Interventions addressing vaccine hesitancy in the WHO European region and in North America (United States and Canada): A systematic review
Flavia Pennisi (Pennisi, F.); Carlo Lunetti (Lunetti, C.); Chiara Barbati (Barbati, C.); Luca Viviani (Viviani, L.); Anna Carole D’Amelio (D’Amelio, A. C.); Anabela Pereira (Pereira, A. da C.); Tiago Correia (Correia, T.); Anna Odone (Odone, A.); Carlo Signorelli (Signorelli, C.); et al.
Journal Title
Public Health Reviews
Year (definitive publication)
2026
Language
English
Country
Switzerland
More Information
Web of Science®

Times Cited: 0

(Last checked: 2026-05-26 19:39)

View record in Web of Science®

Scopus

This publication is not indexed in Scopus

Google Scholar

Times Cited: 0

(Last checked: 2026-05-27 09:39)

View record in Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Overton

Abstract
Objective: Vaccine hesitancy threatens optimal immunization coverage. This review systematically identified and evaluated interventions addressing vaccine hesitancy in the WHO European Region and in North America (United States and Canada). Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception to 17 January 2024. Eligible studies evaluated interventions targeting vaccine hesitancy. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment followed the methodological guidance of the Cochrane Handbook, and reporting adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024565588). Interventions were categorized as educational, communicational, policy-based, organizational, or digital. Results: A total of 59 studies met the inclusion criteria. Effective approaches included multicomponent strategies, community engagement, reminder and recall systems, educational campaigns, and legislative measures. Digital interventions yielded promising but heterogeneous results. The effectiveness of interventions was often enhanced when tailored to specific population needs and local contexts. Conclusion: Multifaceted interventions adapted to the sociocultural context appear most effective in reducing vaccine hesitancy in Europe and North America. Further high-quality studies are needed to refine implementation strategies and evaluate long-term impacts.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Canada,Health communication,Immunization programs,Systematic review,United States
  • Health Sciences - Medical and Health Sciences
Funding Records
Funding Reference Funding Entity
10113327 Comissão Europeia