Artigo de revisão Q1
Interventions addressing vaccine hesitancy in the WHO European region and in North America (United States and Canada): A systematic review
Flavia Pennisi (Pennisi, F.); Carlo Lunetti (Lunetti, C.); Chiara Barbati (Barbati, C.); Luca Viviani (Viviani, L.); Anna Carole D’Amelio (D’Amelio, A. C.); Anabela Pereira (Pereira, A. da C.); Tiago Correia (Correia, T.); Anna Odone (Odone, A.); Carlo Signorelli (Signorelli, C.); et al.
Título Revista
Public Health Reviews
Ano (publicação definitiva)
2026
Língua
Inglês
País
Suíça
Mais Informação
Web of Science®

N.º de citações: 0

(Última verificação: 2026-05-26 19:39)

Ver o registo na Web of Science®

Scopus

Esta publicação não está indexada na Scopus

Google Scholar

N.º de citações: 0

(Última verificação: 2026-05-27 09:39)

Ver o registo no Google Scholar

Esta publicação não está indexada no Overton

Abstract/Resumo
Objective: Vaccine hesitancy threatens optimal immunization coverage. This review systematically identified and evaluated interventions addressing vaccine hesitancy in the WHO European Region and in North America (United States and Canada). Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception to 17 January 2024. Eligible studies evaluated interventions targeting vaccine hesitancy. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment followed the methodological guidance of the Cochrane Handbook, and reporting adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024565588). Interventions were categorized as educational, communicational, policy-based, organizational, or digital. Results: A total of 59 studies met the inclusion criteria. Effective approaches included multicomponent strategies, community engagement, reminder and recall systems, educational campaigns, and legislative measures. Digital interventions yielded promising but heterogeneous results. The effectiveness of interventions was often enhanced when tailored to specific population needs and local contexts. Conclusion: Multifaceted interventions adapted to the sociocultural context appear most effective in reducing vaccine hesitancy in Europe and North America. Further high-quality studies are needed to refine implementation strategies and evaluate long-term impacts.
Agradecimentos/Acknowledgements
--
Palavras-chave
Canada,Health communication,Immunization programs,Systematic review,United States
  • Ciências da Saúde - Ciências Médicas
Registos de financiamentos
Referência de financiamento Entidade Financiadora
10113327 Comissão Europeia