Ciência_Iscte
Publications
Publication Detailed Description
Perspectives on Observational Settings and Consensus on Observational Items for ADHD Assessment in Preschool-Aged Children: A Multi-Informant Delphi Study
Document Title
Manuscript submitted for publication
Year (definitive publication)
N/A
Language
English
Country
--
More Information
--
Web of Science®
This publication is not indexed in Web of Science®
Scopus
This publication is not indexed in Scopus
Google Scholar
This publication is not indexed in Google Scholar
This publication is not indexed in Overton
Abstract
Early ADHD diagnosis faces challenges, including a lack of thoroughly
validated instruments and potential nosological limitations, delaying
diagnosis and interventions that could mitigate negative outcomes. This
multi-informant Delphi study sought consensus on behaviors/symptoms
indicative of ADHD in preschool-age children, and investigated settings
best suited for their observation, to support the development of a
naturalistic observational scale for ADHD assessment in the preschool
years. Four expert-panels participated: psychologists (Round 1, n=25;
Round 2, n=14), pediatricians/child psychiatrists (Round 1, n=9; Round
2, n=6), parents of children with ADHD (Round 1, n=20; Round 2, n=6)
and preschool teachers (Round 1, n =16; Round 2 n=6). Participants
answered prompting questions on behavioral symptoms and
observational procedures in Round 1. In Round 1 and 2, 44
behaviors/symptoms and eight observational settings were rated for their
diagnostic relevance on a five-point Likert scale. Parents answered
according to frequency and impairment on settings. Consensus was
defined as >70% of the group rating an item as 4 or 5. Items close to
consensus (i.e., >65% to 70%) in Round 1 were revised and rated in
Round 2, alongside behaviors derived from open-ended responses, which
were assigned symptom labels. Four observational contexts (e.g., “free
play in a room with peers”) and 10 behaviors/symptoms (e.g., “quickly
shifts from one activity to another,” “easily frustrated”) reached
consensus across all groups. Additionally, 20 behaviors/symptoms
reached consensus on a combination of groups. Of the consensual
behaviors, 10 were adaptations (i.e., behaviors related to the symptom).
Two inattention symptoms (“loses things” and “forgetful”) were not
reported, and two hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms (“difficulty playing
quietly” and “talks excessively”) did not reach consensus. Finally, four
consensual behaviors/symptoms did not fit within the bidimensional
ADHD nosology. In conclusion, the relevance of observational settings
depends on participants’ experience and type of contact with ADHD.
Some consensual behaviors/symptoms were not endorsed by all groups,
suggesting cross-situational variation. Finally, the lack of consensus on
certain symptoms and the emergence of new behaviors/symptoms
supports the investment in defining different assessment tools.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
ADHD,Early assessment,Preschoolers,Observation,Naturalistic
Funding Records
| Funding Reference | Funding Entity |
|---|---|
| https://doi.org/10.54499/2023.01511.BD | FCT |
Português