Working Papers
Perspectives on Observational Settings and Consensus on Observational Items for ADHD Assessment in Preschool-Aged Children: A Multi-Informant Delphi Study
Priska Stefanie Müller (Müller, P.); Adriana Sampaio (Sampaio, A.); Joana Baptista (Baptista, J.);
Document Title
Manuscript submitted for publication
Year (definitive publication)
N/A
Language
English
Country
--
More Information
--
Web of Science®

This publication is not indexed in Web of Science®

Scopus

This publication is not indexed in Scopus

Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Overton

Abstract
Early ADHD diagnosis faces challenges, including a lack of thoroughly validated instruments and potential nosological limitations, delaying diagnosis and interventions that could mitigate negative outcomes. This multi-informant Delphi study sought consensus on behaviors/symptoms indicative of ADHD in preschool-age children, and investigated settings best suited for their observation, to support the development of a naturalistic observational scale for ADHD assessment in the preschool years. Four expert-panels participated: psychologists (Round 1, n=25; Round 2, n=14), pediatricians/child psychiatrists (Round 1, n=9; Round 2, n=6), parents of children with ADHD (Round 1, n=20; Round 2, n=6) and preschool teachers (Round 1, n =16; Round 2 n=6). Participants answered prompting questions on behavioral symptoms and observational procedures in Round 1. In Round 1 and 2, 44 behaviors/symptoms and eight observational settings were rated for their diagnostic relevance on a five-point Likert scale. Parents answered according to frequency and impairment on settings. Consensus was defined as >70% of the group rating an item as 4 or 5. Items close to consensus (i.e., >65% to 70%) in Round 1 were revised and rated in Round 2, alongside behaviors derived from open-ended responses, which were assigned symptom labels. Four observational contexts (e.g., “free play in a room with peers”) and 10 behaviors/symptoms (e.g., “quickly shifts from one activity to another,” “easily frustrated”) reached consensus across all groups. Additionally, 20 behaviors/symptoms reached consensus on a combination of groups. Of the consensual behaviors, 10 were adaptations (i.e., behaviors related to the symptom). Two inattention symptoms (“loses things” and “forgetful”) were not reported, and two hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms (“difficulty playing quietly” and “talks excessively”) did not reach consensus. Finally, four consensual behaviors/symptoms did not fit within the bidimensional ADHD nosology. In conclusion, the relevance of observational settings depends on participants’ experience and type of contact with ADHD. Some consensual behaviors/symptoms were not endorsed by all groups, suggesting cross-situational variation. Finally, the lack of consensus on certain symptoms and the emergence of new behaviors/symptoms supports the investment in defining different assessment tools.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
ADHD,Early assessment,Preschoolers,Observation,Naturalistic
Funding Records
Funding Reference Funding Entity
https://doi.org/10.54499/2023.01511.BD FCT