Scientific journal paper
Public trust and dissatisfaction: digital platforms and public responses to Portugal's vehicle circulation tax debate
Rui Bruno Santos (Santos, R. B.); Cláudia Álvares (Álvares, Cláudia); Helena Carvalho (Carvalho, H.);
Journal Title
Online Information Review
Year (definitive publication)
2026
Language
English
Country
United Kingdom
More Information
Web of Science®

This publication is not indexed in Web of Science®

Scopus

This publication is not indexed in Scopus

Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Google Scholar

This publication is not indexed in Overton

Abstract
In this study, the impact of platform-mediated visibility on Portuguese citizens' responses to the 2024 vehicle circulation tax (IUC) is investigated and the fiscal attitudes that drove these reactions are identified. A thematic and multiple correspondence analysis was performed on 622 comments from an e-participation platform, and the results were interpreted through the frameworks of participatory democracy, platformization and tax compliance. Reactions cluster into five main themes: “fairness-taxation,” “trust in government,” “corruption-income,” “tax awareness” and “not mentioned.” Affective, anti-elite frames were given disproportionate visibility and knowledge-oriented contributions, such as “tax awareness,” remained comparatively peripheral. The following three lines of debate were identified: (1) tax literacy and fiscal justice, (2) perceived corruption and inequality of income and (3) trust in government, usually expressed in the form of disillusionment. The petition served, on one hand, as a tool of mobilization, and, on the other, as a place for political contestation, increasing the risk of polarization. This is a single-country study based on public comments. To be generalized, the findings should be compared with different policies and platforms in other contexts through longitudinal or mixed-methods designs that link online discourse to policy responsiveness. This study underscores the importance of aligning policy design with transparent and responsive communication. Policymakers should address taxpayer concerns to strengthen legitimacy and tax compliance while mitigating polarization. It offers a novel empirical insight into digital fiscal participation. The study demonstrates that algorithmic visibility and affective salience increase anti-elite expressions but decrease informational depth, which in turn lowers perceived tax legitimacy by changing perceptions of fairness, trust and corruption. The study developed an analytical framework that can be replicated and bridges the gap between tax compliance, media logic and platform studies.
Acknowledgements
--
Keywords
Citizen participation,Public opinion,Tax policy