This study aims to understand magistrates’ perceptions about the role of social and psychological reports within juvenile justice system. Regarding technicians’ perceptions, it intends to acess their perspectives on the relevance of psychosocial assessment and case managing; as well as their views on magistrates’ valuation of technical work. Finally, it aims to explore the interaction and cooperation between these professional groups. Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with Juvenile Justice magistrates: nine judges and three prosecutors. Simultaneously, twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with social technicians (graduated in Psychology, Social Service, Education Sciences) from the Portuguese Juvenile Justice Services. Two semi-structured protocols were developed for this purpose. Data was analysed using a thematic analysis approach. From the magistrates’ perspective, an expressive valuation is assigned to psychosocial assessment (pre-sentence phase) and managing of juvenile justice cases (post sentencing phase) by contributing to informed judicial decision-making. A central role is played by social technicians, while serving as a mediator between magistrates and youth/their families. From the technicians’ perspective, psychosocial assessment is recognized as a fundamental piece for a well-function juvenile justice system. Transcriptions of technical reports in juvenile court sentences are a good exemple of this influence. In parallel lack of human ressources is constantly reported, despite citations of diverse youth-oriented programs and quality technicians. A demand for a more frequent managing and follow up of young socioeducational measures is required. Lastly, a better interaction between magistrates and technicians is recognized as a great need to improve interpersonal knowledge as well as professional pratices.

--

Juvenile Justice System,Psychosocial Assessment,Judicial Perceptions