Artigo em revista científica
Sequencing critical moves for ethical argumentation practice: Munāẓara and the interdependence of procedure and agent
Rahmi Oruç (Oruç, R.); Mali Üzelgün (Uzelgun, M.); Karim Sadek (Sadek, K.);
Título Revista
Informal Logic
Ano (publicação definitiva)
2023
Língua
Inglês
País
Canadá
Mais Informação
Web of Science®

N.º de citações: 1

(Última verificação: 2024-12-02 16:21)

Ver o registo na Web of Science®

Scopus

N.º de citações: 2

(Última verificação: 2024-11-30 00:56)

Ver o registo na Scopus

Google Scholar

N.º de citações: 4

(Última verificação: 2024-12-02 00:24)

Ver o registo no Google Scholar

Abstract/Resumo
The aim of this paper is to highlight an interdependence between procedural and agential norms that undermines their neat separation when appraising argumentation. Drawing on the munāẓara tradition, we carve a space for sequencing in argumentation scholarship. Focusing on the antagonist’s sequencing of critical moves, we identify each sequence’s corresponding values of argumentation: coalescence, reliability, and efficacy. These values arise through the mediation of virtues and simultaneously underpin procedural as well as agential norms. Consequently, an ambiguity between procedure and agent becomes apparent. This ambiguity hints at the potential for a virtue theory of argumentation that draws on procedural norms.
Agradecimentos/Acknowledgements
--
Palavras-chave
Sequencing,Critical moves,Values of argumentation,Munāẓara,Argumentative virtues and vices