Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Medeiros, E. (2024). Bottlenecks and good practices of DNSH implementation in Cohesion Policy: a comparison between rural and urban areas.
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
E. J. Medeiros,  "Bottlenecks and good practices of DNSH implementation in Cohesion Policy: a comparison between rural and urban areas",, 2024
Exportar BibTeX 
@techreport{medeiros2024_1732248955620,
	author = "Medeiros, E.",
	title = "Bottlenecks and good practices of DNSH implementation in Cohesion Policy: a comparison between rural and urban areas",
	year = "2024",
	number = "",
	institution = "",
	address = "",
	url = "https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/policy/communities-and-networks/cohesion-4-transition/C4T_ASB_Knowledge_Piece_DNSH_Principle.pdf"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - RPRT
TI  - Bottlenecks and good practices of DNSH implementation in Cohesion Policy: a comparison between rural and urban areas
AU  - Medeiros, E.
PY  - 2024
UR  - https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/policy/communities-and-networks/cohesion-4-transition/C4T_ASB_Knowledge_Piece_DNSH_Principle.pdf
AB  - The ‘Do No Significant Harm’ principle (DNSH) seeks to ensure that
European Union policies and European cohesion policy achievements
comply with the objective of not significantly harming the environment
and climate.
The inclusion of an EU principle like the DNSH can increase the administrative burden on Managing Authorities. However, it can deliver positive
impacts in modernising and enhancing the effectiveness of public bodies
regarding policy monitoring and evaluation frameworks.
In some cases, like Finland, the proposed DNSH evaluation methodology
is detailed and elaborate. Other Member States, like Portugal, Italy, and
Belgium, are more practical in their approach to assessing DNSH. Countries have different administrative capacity levels to assess ECP funds
and requirements.
Harmonising and simplifying the implementation of the DNSH principle
through increased clarity in the requirements and a harmonised policy
evaluation framework is recommended. This simplification process applies
to the legal basis for the inclusion of the DNSH principle across the different
instruments and the DNSH policy evaluation methodologies across EU
Member States, which can allow an overall comparison of the implementation of this principle
ER  -