Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA) 
Freire, A. & Santana-Pereira, J. (2012). Economic voting in Portugal, 2002–2009. Electoral Studies. 31 (3), 506-512
Exportar Referência (IEEE) 
A. R. Freire and J. A. Santucci,  "Economic voting in Portugal, 2002–2009", in Electoral Studies, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 506-512, 2012
Exportar BibTeX 
@article{freire2012_1713310666348,
	author = "Freire, A. and Santana-Pereira, J.",
	title = "Economic voting in Portugal, 2002–2009",
	journal = "Electoral Studies",
	year = "2012",
	volume = "31",
	number = "3",
	doi = "10.1016/j.electstud.2012.02.006",
	pages = "506-512",
	url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379412000273"
}
Exportar RIS 
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Economic voting in Portugal, 2002–2009
T2  - Electoral Studies
VL  - 31
IS  - 3
AU  - Freire, A.
AU  - Santana-Pereira, J.
PY  - 2012
SP  - 506-512
SN  - 0261-3794
DO  - 10.1016/j.electstud.2012.02.006
UR  - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379412000273
AB  - This article tests the economic voting hypothesis in Portugal during the three most recent first-order elections (2002, 2005, 2009), trying to make sense of the multiplicity of choices in the Portuguese party system. We observed that positive sociotropic perceptions increase the probability to vote for the incumbent, even when we control for long-term factors of vote choice; egotropic effects are weaker. Negative economic perceptions not only lead to a higher probability to vote for the major opposition party, but, in some cases, increase the probabilities to vote for small parties or to refrain from voting. Sociotropic effects are actually quite constant in this timeframe, but their strength to explain the vote is lower than that of ideology and (before 2009) religiosity.
ER  -