Exportar Publicação

A publicação pode ser exportada nos seguintes formatos: referência da APA (American Psychological Association), referência do IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), BibTeX e RIS.

Exportar Referência (APA)
Burns, T, Roszkowska, E. & Machado, Nora (2014). Distributive justice: from Steinhaus, Knaster, and Banach to Elster and Rawls: the perspective of sociological game theory. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric. 37 (1), 11-38
Exportar Referência (IEEE)
T. Burns et al.,  "Distributive justice: from Steinhaus, Knaster, and Banach to Elster and Rawls: the perspective of sociological game theory", in Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 11-38, 2014
Exportar BibTeX
@article{burns2014_1716300466149,
	author = "Burns, T and Roszkowska, E. and Machado, Nora",
	title = "Distributive justice: from Steinhaus, Knaster, and Banach to Elster and Rawls: the perspective of sociological game theory",
	journal = "Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric",
	year = "2014",
	volume = "37",
	number = "1",
	doi = "10.2478/slgr-2014-0015",
	pages = "11-38",
	url = "http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/slgr.2014.37.issue-1/slgr-2014-0015/slgr-2014-0015.xml"
}
Exportar RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Distributive justice: from Steinhaus, Knaster, and Banach to Elster and Rawls: the perspective of sociological game theory
T2  - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
VL  - 37
IS  - 1
AU  - Burns, T
AU  - Roszkowska, E.
AU  - Machado, Nora
PY  - 2014
SP  - 11-38
SN  - 2199-6059
DO  - 10.2478/slgr-2014-0015
UR  - http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/slgr.2014.37.issue-1/slgr-2014-0015/slgr-2014-0015.xml
AB  - This article presents a relatively straightforward theoretical framework about distributive justice with applications. It draws on a few key concepts of Sociological Game Theory (SGT). SGT is presented briefly in section 2. Section 3 provides a spectrum of distributive cases concerning principles of equality, differentiation among recipients according to performance or contribution, status or authority, or need. Two general types of social organization of distributive judgment are distinguished and judgment procedures or algorithms are modeled in each type of social organization. Section 4 discusses briefly the larger moral landscapes of human judgment – how distribution may typically be combined with other value into consideration. The article suggests that Rawls, Elster, and Machado point in this direction. Finally, it is suggested that the SGT framework presented provides a useful point of departure to systematically link it and
compare the Warsaw School of Fair Division, Rawls, and Elster, among others.
ER  -