Artigo em revista científica Q2
Distributive justice: from Steinhaus, Knaster, and Banach to Elster and Rawls: the perspective of sociological game theory
Tom Burns (Burns, T); Ewa Roszkowska (Roszkowska, E.); Nora Johansson (Machado, Nora);
Título Revista
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Ano (publicação definitiva)
Mais Informação
Web of Science®

Esta publicação não está indexada na Web of Science®


N.º de citações: 4

(Última verificação: 2024-05-22 12:00)

Ver o registo na Scopus

: 1.9
Google Scholar

Esta publicação não está indexada no Google Scholar

This article presents a relatively straightforward theoretical framework about distributive justice with applications. It draws on a few key concepts of Sociological Game Theory (SGT). SGT is presented briefly in section 2. Section 3 provides a spectrum of distributive cases concerning principles of equality, differentiation among recipients according to performance or contribution, status or authority, or need. Two general types of social organization of distributive judgment are distinguished and judgment procedures or algorithms are modeled in each type of social organization. Section 4 discusses briefly the larger moral landscapes of human judgment – how distribution may typically be combined with other value into consideration. The article suggests that Rawls, Elster, and Machado point in this direction. Finally, it is suggested that the SGT framework presented provides a useful point of departure to systematically link it and compare the Warsaw School of Fair Division, Rawls, and Elster, among others.
Distributive justice; Fair division; Sociological game theory; Adjudicated distribution; Self-organized distribution; Distributive procedures/algorithms
  • Filosofia, Ética e Religião - Humanidades